This is a sample Neighborhood Research Report. Sign up to create your personalized report for any address, neighborhood, ZIP code, or town in the US, free of charge.

This report was generated by Maptimum. Visit www.maptimum.com to create yours for any area in the U.S.

Neighborhood Report for Windsor

This comprehensive research report provides up-to-date and accurate data, along with AI-powered analysis, on the following area:

Address Surroundings Created on
3.21-mi Radius 09/01/2024

Executive Summary

Fun Facts

  • Historical Significance: Windsor, CT, is the oldest town in Connecticut, founded in 1633. This rich history is reflected in its well-preserved colonial architecture and historic landmarks like the Oliver Ellsworth Homestead.
  • Diverse Community: Windsor is known for its diverse population, with a significant mix of racial and ethnic groups, including a notable African American community that makes up 27% of the population.
  • Natural Beauty: The town is home to the scenic Farmington River, which offers opportunities for kayaking, fishing, and picturesque riverside walks.

Suitability

  • Diverse Population: With a racial and ethnic composition that includes 51% Non-Hispanic White, 27% Black/African American, and 11% Hispanic, Windsor aligns well with your preference for a diverse community.
  • Serene Environment: The area boasts 28% wooded areas and 14% landscaped areas, providing a serene and natural environment perfect for long-term residence.
  • Political Climate: Windsor's political leanings are predominantly liberal, with 70% of the votes going to Biden in the 2020 election, matching your political preference.
  • Safety Concerns: While the personal crime index is low at 21, the property crime index is slightly above the national average at 108. This might be a consideration for long-term safety.
  • Overall Conclusion: Windsor, CT, offers a diverse, serene, and politically compatible environment for empty nesters, though some attention to property crime rates may be necessary.

The Positive

  • High Education Levels: With 43% of residents holding a college or graduate degree, the area is well-educated, which often correlates with higher community engagement and better local services.
  • Strong Homeownership: The owner-occupied rate is 73%, indicating a stable and invested community, which is beneficial for long-term residency.
  • Sound Environment: The sound score of 82 suggests a calm and quiet environment, ideal for those seeking a peaceful living space.

The Negative

  • Population Decline: The 5-year population growth forecast is -0.91%, indicating a slight decline, which could impact local services and property values in the long term.
  • Flood Risk: The area has a high flood risk, including zones with a 1% annual chance of flooding. This could affect property insurance rates and require additional precautions.
  • School Quality: The main school district, Windsor School District, ranks in the 23rd percentile in the state, which might be a concern if you have visiting grandchildren or are considering future resale value.

Alternatives

  • West Hartford, CT : Known for its vibrant community and excellent school system, West Hartford offers a more urban feel with a diverse population and a strong liberal presence. However, it may come with a higher cost of living.
  • Glastonbury, CT : This town provides a mix of suburban and rural living with beautiful parks and a strong sense of community. It also has a high median household income and excellent schools, though it may be less diverse.
  • Simsbury, CT : Offering a picturesque setting with a strong emphasis on outdoor activities and historic charm, Simsbury is another great option. It has a high owner-occupancy rate and excellent schools but may be less politically liberal.

Desirability Score

Measures how closely a neighborhood matches an ideal location, ignoring cost. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better suitability for the typical homebuyer.

64/100

Bang for the Buck Score

Measures the quality of life relative to cost. Scores range from 0 to 100; a score above 50 indicates good value, while below 50 suggests the area may be overpriced.

86/100

The People

Population

Rising population growth often signals a vibrant, growing community, leading to increased housing demand and potential for value appreciation. However, it's a double-edged sword; rapid growth might stretch local infrastructure and resources, possibly impacting the area's quality of life.

Population 27,694
Population (5-Year Projection) 27,441
5-Year Growth Forecast -0.91%
Density (Person per Square Mile) 856
Density Level Low

Household Composition

The makeup of households is a valuable insight for those seeking areas that resonate with family-oriented or child-friendly vibes.

Number of Households 11,446
Average Household Size 2.42
Household Makeup
Families with Kids 26.96%
Families without Kids 35.77%
Non-Families 37.27%

Age Groups

Age information is helpful for those aiming to align their living environment with their lifestyle preferences—whether you’re drawn to the energy and vibrancy of younger communities or the tranquility and maturity of areas with an older demographic.

Median Age 45.80
Age Groups
0-9 Years 9.05%
10-19 Years 10.12%
20-34 Years 17.71%
35-49 Years 17.77%
50-64 Years 21.34%
65+ Years 24.01%

Racial/Ethnic Composition

This breakdown helps pinpoint areas that align with your desire for cultural homogeneity or diversity.

Non-Hispanic White 50.67%
Hispanic 10.68%
Black/African American 26.70%
Asian 6.56%
Other 5.39%

The Economy

Education

Educational attainment percentages are for individuals aged 25 and older. Higher education levels in a community often correlate with increased civic engagement, safety, and prosperity.

Average Schooling Years 15.46
Educational Attainment Breakdown
Less than High School 5.22%
High School or Some College 52.24%
College Degree 22.67%
Graduate/Professional Degree 19.87%

Income Distribution

This section provides a detailed breakdown of household income levels in the area. Understanding a community's financial standing can reveal insights into its standard of living, economic diversity, and growth potential.

Median Household Income $101,700
On Food Stamps/SNAP 8.19%
Income Brackets
$0-$25K 8.45%
$25K-$50K 11.41%
$50K-$100K 28.75%
$100K-$200K 37.31%
$200K+ 14.07%

Housing

Occupancy Rates

Areas where most houses are owner-occupied (rather than rented) are more desirable because owners are more financially and emotionally invested in their properties and the community's well-being. High vacancy rates are a negative indicator, as they can signal that the area is in decline.

Total Housing Units 11,937
Occupancy
Owner Occupied 73.00%
Renter Occupied 22.89%
Vacant 4.11%

Age of Buildings

Reviewing the age of structures helps you understand the mix of modern and historic structures, anticipate the longevity of the infrastructure, and make informed investment decisions based on the area's growth and evolution.

Median Year Built 1973
Age Breakdown
New (Since 2020) 0.40%
Recent (2010-2019) 4.70%
Mid-Age (1980-2009) 31.04%
Old (Before 1980) 63.86%

Nearby Low-Income Housing

The availability of subsidized housing can influence neighborhood property values.

Main Types of Subsidized Housing:

  • Public Housing: Government-owned, managed by local authorities, offering affordable rents to low-income residents.
  • Project-Based Section 8: Private landlords provide reduced-rent apartments, subsidized by the government.
  • Low Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC): Incentivizes private developers with tax credits to create below-market rent properties for low-income tenants. LIHTC does not directly subsidize rents.

In the table below, Properties refer to distinct parcels of land or buildings designated as low-income housing. Units are the individual housing units (such as apartments) within those properties.

Total Properties 2
Closest Property (mi) 2.16
Total Units 43
Units per Square Mile 1.33
Property Types
Public Housing -
Section 8 -
LIHTC 2 (43 Units)

Land Cover

Understanding a neighborhood's land cover helps you evaluate the aesthetic appeal, potential for recreational activities, and the balance of natural versus developed spaces.

Concise descriptions for each land cover category:

  • Landscaped Areas: Developed open spaces consisting mostly of vegetation, such as parks, golf courses, and residential gardens.
  • Residential Areas: Areas with a balanced mix of buildings and vegetation, such as single-family homes.
  • Urban & Commercial: Highly developed zones, including apartment complexes and commercial/industrial buildings.
  • Water Bodies: Open bodies of water like lakes, rivers, and ponds.
  • Wooded Areas: Forests dominated by tall trees, either deciduous, evergreen, or mixed.
  • Wild Vegetation: Areas with natural plant growth, including shrubs and herbaceous vegetation.
  • Farms & Gardens: Agricultural lands used for crops or livestock, such as fields of corn, soybeans, or pastures for grazing.
  • Marshes & Swamps: Wetlands either forested or grass-dominated.

Landscaped Areas 13.55%
Residential Areas 27.28%
Urban & Commercial 3.10%
Water Bodies 5.12%
Wooded Areas 28.08%
Wild Vegetation 1.51%
Farms & Gardens 10.36%
Marshes & Swamps 10.10%

Safety and Security

Crime Indexes

Crime Indexes compare local safety to a national average set at 100. For example, a crime index of 200 means the area has double the national average crime rate. Remember, the national average includes quieter rural areas, so urban centers may naturally show higher indexes.

  • Property crime involves private property, such as burglary and motor vehicle theft.
  • Personal crime is characterized as a violent crime that results in physical, emotional, or psychological harm to the victim, such as assault and battery.

Total Crime Index 94
Property Crime Index 108
Personal Crime Index 21

Fatal Car Accidents and DUIs

Government agencies release national fatal car accident data with a two-year delay. Extra caution is recommended in areas with higher accident frequencies.

You can see the exact location of fatal accidents on the map:

  • Non-DUI Accidents: Fatal accidents where the driver was not under the influence.
  • DUI Accidents: Fatal accidents where the driver was under the influence.

Data Period 2019-2022
All Fatal Accidents 8
Annual Fatal Accidents per Square Mile 0.06
Involving DUI 50.00%

Sex Offender Registry

This section provides detailed information from the Sex Offender Registry, including names, addresses, and specific convictions, to enhance your neighborhood safety awareness.

Total Sex Offenders 28
Sex Offenders per Square Mile 0.86
Closest Sex Offender (mi) 0.61
Conviction Type
Offense Against Children 8
Rape 0
Sexual Battery 9
Other Offense 11
# Photo Name and Address Distance Conviction
1 SHOAIB OMED
64 BRENTWOOD LN, WINDSOR, CT 06095
0.61 mi Sexual Battery
2 DORIAN MICHAEL ROBERTS
200 CORPORATE DR, WINDSOR, CT 06095
0.70 mi Other Offense
3 JAMES HUGHES
581 POQUONOCK AVE, WINDSOR, CT 06095
1.03 mi Other Offense
4 DOUGLAS C BRAELFORT
581 Poquonock Ave Attn: Adminstrator, Windsor, CT 06095
1.03 mi Sexual Battery
5 BRUCE F ALLISON
953 HIGH PATH RD, WINDSOR, CT 06095
1.23 mi Offense Against Children
6 JEFFREY SCOTT LAPORTO
14 MICHELLE LN, WINDSOR, CT 06095
1.37 mi Sexual Battery
7 CLINTON IRVILE PRENTICE
373 DUNFEY LN, WINDSOR, CT 06095
1.45 mi Other Offense
8 LOGAN THOMAS HEMSWORTH
104 UPSON AVE, BERLIN, CT 06037
1.58 mi Sexual Battery
9 DEAVON M WHARTON
158 EAST ST, WINDSOR, CT 06095
1.72 mi Other Offense
10 SAMUEL DEJESUS
10 HOLLOW BROOK RD, WINDSOR, CT 06095
1.74 mi Other Offense
11 RICHARD WIMLER
1899 POQUONOCK AVE, WINDSOR, CT 06095
2.10 mi Sexual Battery
12 DONALD LIPHARD
5 DORCHESTER DR, WINDSOR, CT 06095
2.20 mi Offense Against Children
13 MICHAEL YOUNG
106 BLOOMFIELD AVE, WINDSOR, CT 06095
2.21 mi Other Offense
14 Casey Marie Potts
27 Meakin Drive, Windsor, CT 06095
2.25 mi Offense Against Children
15 MICHAEL JOSEPH VADAKIN
52 BLOOMFIELD AVE 1ST FLR, WINDSOR, CT 06095
2.29 mi Other Offense
16 DAVID LOUIS CERMOLA
1980 POQUONOCK AVE, WINDSOR, CT 06095
2.29 mi Sexual Battery
17 ASHISH KUMAR PATEL
23 MERRIGAN LN Unit 23, WINDSOR LOCKS, CT 06096
2.37 mi Offense Against Children
18 CHRISTOPHER JOHN WATTS
257 PALISADO AVE, WINDSOR, CT 06095
2.43 mi Other Offense
19 PAUL K COOK
73 HIGH ST, WINDSOR, CT 06095
2.63 mi Other Offense
20 KYLE ANDREW CIRILLO
29 ALICIA TER, WINDSOR LOCKS, CT 06096
2.78 mi Other Offense
21 JAMAAL A DUMAS
20 WALNUT CIR, WINDSOR LOCKS, CT 06096
2.79 mi Offense Against Children
22 EVAN THOMAS PAILTHORPE
11 GREENLAND ST, WINDSOR LOCKS, CT 06096
2.84 mi Offense Against Children
23 MICHAEL SCOTT SMITH
1188 BLUE HILLS AVE, BLOOMFIELD, CT 06002
2.92 mi Other Offense
24 PAUL JEROME YOUNGBLOOD
2 LOTEN DR 110, WINDSOR LOCKS, CT 06096
2.96 mi Sexual Battery
25 GUY PATRICK OUELLETTE
12 NOD RD, WINDSOR, CT 06095
3.00 mi Offense Against Children
26 JOSEPH E FOOTE
124 SOUTH WEST AVE APT W14, WINDSOR LOCKS, CT 06096
3.04 mi Sexual Battery
27 MARK A DANIELS
131 OLD COUNTY RD APT B 183, WINDSOR LOCKS, CT 06096
3.06 mi Sexual Battery
28 JOHN MCGRATH
131 OLD COUNTY ROAD APT 261, WINDSOR LOCKS, CT 06096
3.06 mi Offense Against Children

Schools

Public School Districts

In many areas, students' options for attending public schools are determined by their residential address, linking them to specific school districts. Consequently, the quality of the schools within these districts plays a crucial role in shaping the educational outcomes of students. Additionally, high-performing school districts often indicate a strong community commitment to education, which can reflect positively on the neighborhood's overall desirability.

On the map, you will find the school districts that intersect with your selected area, along with detailed information about the nearby schools within each district.

Main District Windsor School District
Grade Range PK-12
Number of Schools 6
Number of Students 3,337
Student/Teacher Ratio 10.14
State Rank 122 out of 158
State Rank Percentile 22.78%
Other Nearby Districts Bloomfield School District, South Windsor School District, Windsor Locks School District
Name Level District Distance (mi) Students State Rank Percentile Student/Teacher Ratio On Lunch Subsidy White Hispanic Black Asian
Poquonock Elementary School Elementary (PK-2) Windsor School District 1.79 374 - 12.70 40.91% 22.99% 27.27% 37.43% 3.48%
Oliver Ellsworth School Elementary (PK-2) Windsor School District 1.83 431 - 11.30 40.84% 26.22% 24.59% 30.63% 5.80%
Windsor High School High (9-12) Windsor School District 2.54 1,100 50.34% 9.30 38.82% 22.64% 21.36% 43.82% 3.27%
Sage Park Middle School Middle (6-8) Windsor School District 2.65 698 48.00% 9.80 43.55% 17.34% 25.21% 45.99% 3.15%
John F. Kennedy School Elementary (3-5) Windsor School District 2.83 364 33.60% 9.90 41.76% 23.63% 29.95% 31.87% 4.67%
Clover Street School Elementary (3-5) Windsor School District 3.21 284 37.22% 9.30 41.90% 24.65% 27.46% 36.27% 3.87%
South Elementary School Elementary (3-5) Windsor Locks School District 3.34 338 43.06% 9.90 45.56% 57.99% 15.38% 13.91% 6.80%
Windsor Locks High School High (9-12) Windsor Locks School District 3.35 415 - 8.60 38.55% 54.94% 20.72% 11.57% 6.99%
Laurel Literacy Academy Elementary (PK-2) Bloomfield School District 3.78 307 - 10.20 66.78% 5.86% 20.52% 65.47% 2.61%
Windsor Locks Middle School Middle (6-8) Windsor Locks School District 4.05 318 44.40% 7.70 45.91% 53.46% 19.50% 12.89% 6.29%
Metacomet School Elementary (3-4) Bloomfield School District 4.10 218 30.38% 11.40 61.01% 3.67% 15.60% 74.31% 1.83%
North Street School Elementary (PK-2) Windsor Locks School District 4.26 397 - 10.70 42.32% 61.71% 16.12% 9.82% 4.79%
Carmen Arace Middle School Middle (7-8) Bloomfield School District 4.34 246 35.60% 9.90 60.57% 3.25% 14.23% 78.46% 0.41%
Carmen Arace Intermediate School Middle (5-6) Bloomfield School District 4.34 215 - 12.50 60.00% 2.33% 13.95% 75.35% 4.19%
Bloomfield High School High (9-12) Bloomfield School District 4.42 525 - 9.40 57.52% 2.29% 13.14% 80.76% 0.76%
Pleasant Valley School Elementary (PK-5) South Windsor School District 6.17 678 87.12% 14.60 15.93% 33.33% 9.88% 6.19% 47.20%

Charter, Magnet, and Private Schools

For families seeking alternatives to traditional public schools, several options are available:

  • Charter Schools: Publicly funded but independently run, charter schools offer innovative curriculums and may enroll students from any area.
  • Magnet Schools: Specializing in areas like science, the arts, or technology, magnet schools attract students from multiple districts with unique programs.
  • Private Schools: Privately funded, these schools are not bound by many of the public school regulations and often provide customized educational experiences with smaller class sizes.

The map displays nearby charter, magnet, and private schools (if any) along with key information about each.

Name Level Type Faith Affiliation Coed Distance (mi) Students State Rank Percentile Student/Teacher Ratio On Lunch Subsidy White Hispanic Black Asian
Academy of Aerospace and Engineering High (6-12) Magnet - - 1.61 768 40.69% 12.90 55.60% 13.28% 42.32% 32.55% 8.46%
Praise Power & Prayer Christian School Private (K-12) Private Christian (no specific denomination) Coed 2.02 41 - 10.20 - 19.51% 21.95% 43.90% 0.00%
Oneschool Global- Manchester Campus Private (4-11) Private Brethren Coed 2.26 10 - 3.30 - 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
St Gabriel School Private (PK-8) Private Roman Catholic Coed 2.27 159 - 9.90 - 41.51% 6.29% 27.04% 3.14%
Windsor Montessori School Private (PK-K) Private Nonsectarian Coed 2.47 45 - 2.90 - 26.67% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Academy of International Studies 6-12 High (6-12) Magnet - - 2.75 709 - 11.80 68.12% 8.46% 30.61% 51.90% 2.68%
Trinity Christian School Private (PK-5) Private Methodist Coed 2.79 - - - - - - - -
The Loomis Chaffee School Private (9-12) Private Nonsectarian Coed 3.04 703 - 3.30 - 56.61% 2.28% 11.10% 21.05%
Global Experience Magnet School High (6-12) Magnet - - 3.15 195 - 9.90 58.46% 12.82% 33.85% 42.05% 0.51%
Ana Grace Academy of the Arts Elementary (PK-8) Magnet - - 3.19 863 26.36% 22.80 71.03% 14.60% 45.89% 30.82% 0.81%
Wintonbury Early Childhood Magnet School Prekindergarten (PK) Magnet - - 4.62 310 - 14.00 43.23% 32.90% 13.23% 43.23% 5.81%
Museum Academy Elementary (PK-5) Magnet - - 4.86 513 21.73% 14.20 66.28% 13.84% 29.63% 47.56% 1.56%
The Bess & Paul Sigel Hebrew Academy Private (PK-8) Private Jewish Coed 4.96 - - - - - - - -
High Road School Of Wallingford -Hartford Primary Private (2-8) Private Nonsectarian Coed 5.77 - - - - - - - -
Oak Hill School Private (K-12) Private Nonsectarian Coed 5.77 116 - 12.80 - 32.76% 29.31% 25.00% 2.59%
University High School of Science and Engineering High (9-12) Magnet - - 5.95 412 70.34% 14.20 66.02% 16.75% 22.82% 46.60% 8.74%
New England Jewish Academy Private (PK-12) Private Jewish Coed 6.03 121 - 4.30 - 88.43% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Academy of Computer Science and Engineering High (9-12) Magnet - - 6.14 496 - 9.90 77.82% 12.90% 51.41% 29.64% 1.41%
University of Hartford Magnet School Elementary (PK-5) Magnet - - 6.20 510 24.55% 13.00 62.35% 13.92% 26.08% 49.41% 2.75%
STEM Magnet at Annie Fisher School Elementary (K-8) Magnet - - 6.21 344 34.61% 11.70 61.63% 4.65% 19.77% 52.62% 16.57%
Montessori Magnet at Fisher School Elementary (PK-8) Magnet - - 6.21 343 22.33% 25.40 61.81% 15.45% 19.83% 52.77% 7.29%
Watkinson School Private (6-12) Private Nonsectarian Coed 6.34 216 - 5.40 - 61.57% 7.87% 13.89% 6.94%

Environmental Health

Drinking Water Quality

Clean drinking water is essential for good health. Under the Safe Drinking Water Act, water systems are required to meet strict safety regulations. Maptimum’s Water Health Score assesses water systems based on the following key factors:

  • Population Served: Larger systems often have more resources and improved efficiency.
  • Source: Groundwater (such as wells) is typically safer than surface water (like rivers) because it is naturally filtered through soil and rock, reducing the risk of contamination.
  • Lead and Copper Levels: Lead and copper can enter drinking water from the corrosion of older pipes and plumbing. The 90th percentile of samples must meet EPA limits—0.015 mg/L for lead and 1.3 mg/L for copper.
  • Health-Based Violations: These occur when contaminant levels (like Lead or Chlorine) exceed safe standards, or when treatment processes fail.
  • Monitoring and Reporting Violations: Major violations where systems fail to properly monitor or report water quality.
  • Unresolved Violations: Health-based or major violations that have not been resolved according to the latest reports.

Remember, water systems often cover entire cities or regions, so moving within the same area may not significantly change your water quality.

Water System METROPOLITAN DISTRICT COMMISSION
Water Health Score 4.45 / 5 Good
Population Served 390,887
Primary Source Surface water
Lead and Copper (Latest Sampling)
Lead (Pb) 0.0000 mg/L Safe
Copper (Cu) No Data
Serious Violations (Last 5 Years)
Health Based 0
Monitoring/Reporting 0
Not Yet Resolved 0

Air Quality

Air quality directly impacts health, with pollution linked to multiple health concerns. Air quality can vary within a day and seasonally. Our analysis uses hourly data from the past 365 days, highlighting the percentage of time the Air Quality Index (AQI) and specific pollutants were in the dangerous range.

Poor or Very Poor Air Quality 2.73%
Worst Month June
Major Pollutant O3
Pollutants
Bad or Very Bad SO2 0.00%
Bad or Very Bad NO2 0.00%
Bad or Very Bad PM10 0.00%
Bad or Very Bad PM2.5 0.00%
Bad or Very Bad O3 1.74%
Bad or Very Bad CO 0.00%

Hazardous Waste Sites

Hazardous waste sites near your home can pollute air, soil, and water, posing health risks like respiratory issues, contaminated drinking water, and long-term exposure to hazardous chemicals. Even compliant facilities, when densely clustered, can create cumulative environmental impacts that affect quality of life and property values.

We consider a facility high-risk based on a combination of the following criteria:

  • Active: Facilities with ongoing operations have a higher likelihood of environmental contamination.
  • Transport: Involvement in waste transport raises the risk of accidents or spills.
  • High Output: Large Quantity Generators (LQG) produce significant amounts of waste, posing greater risks.
  • TSDFs: Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities (TSDFs) handle hazardous waste, with a high potential for leaks and spills.
  • History of Violations: Past violations of EPA or state regulations indicate a higher risk of non-compliance and incidents.

All Sites 114
High-Risk Sites 11
High-Risk Sites per Square Mile 0.34
Closest High-Risk Site (mi) 1.54
Facility Types
Active 82
Transport 0
Large Quantity Generator 9
TSDFs 0
With Recent Violations 2

Noise Pollution

A Soundscore™ rating, ranging from 50 (indicating high noise levels) to 100 (signifying low noise levels), measures the environmental noise of a location, providing a quantifiable insight into the auditory environment you can expect.

Sound Score 82 (Calm)
Sources of Noise
Airports Calm
Vehicular Traffic Calm
Local Commercial and Community Calm

Natural Risks

Earthquake Risk

This section utilizes Peak Ground Acceleration (PGA) data from the US Geological Survey (USGS) to forecast the maximum potential earthquake intensity and damage with a 2% probability of being exceeded in the area over the next 50 years, providing valuable insights into seismic risks.

PGA 0.10
Earthquake Risk Very Low

Flood Risk

The flood risk data, sourced from FEMA, assess the likelihood and potential impacts of flooding by considering various factors including flood frequency, proximity to water bodies, and property characteristics like elevation and rebuilding costs.

On the map, areas are designated as high risk or moderate risk:

  • High Risk: Classified as Special Flood Hazard Areas (SFHA), these regions face a 1% annual chance of flooding (equivalent to a 26% chance over a 30-year period, or a 100-year flood risk). In these areas, purchasing flood insurance is mandatory.
  • Moderate Risk: These zones have a 0.2% annual chance of flooding (equivalent to a 6% chance within a 30-year timeframe, or a 500-year flood risk). Flood insurance is recommended here. Such areas may transition to high-risk in the future due to factors like urban development or environmental changes.

Has High-Risk Zones Yes (Type: AE, A)
Closest High-Risk Zone (mi) 0.57
Has Moderate-Risk Zones Yes (Type: X)

Lifestyle

Walkability and Bikeability

The Walk Score, ranging from 0 to 100, gauges an address's accessibility on foot—the higher the score, the easier it is to accomplish daily errands without a car.

Similarly, the Bike Score evaluates an area's suitability for cycling based on infrastructure, topography, proximity to key destinations, road connectivity, and the cycling community's presence.

Walk Score® 2 (Car-Dependent)
Bike Score® 32 (Somewhat Bikeable)

Dating and Marriage Outlook

Gain insights into the area's potential for connections, dating, and finding life partners. This section explores the social landscape, highlighting marital status for residents 15 years and older and detailing the female-to-male ratio for those aged 20 to 44. A ratio above 1 indicates more women than men, suggesting enhanced dating prospects for men, and vice versa.

Marrital Status
Single, Never Married 33.05%
Married 50.14%
Other 16.81%
Female to Male Ratio 0.96

Pet Friendliness

Pets, especially dogs, provide a great way for locals to interact and build connections. If you have pets, you'll likely enjoy living in an area with a high percentage of fellow pet owners.

Has Any Pet 53.21%
Has Dog(s) 39.42%
Has Cat(s) 24.03%

Politics and Social Climate

Voting Patterns

Living in a community that shares your values can be important. Our detailed analysis of Presidential Election results at the precinct level—the most granular unit for voting data—allows you to understand the political tendencies of the area.

On the map, the precicits that intersect with your selected area, along with their vote count in the 2020 election, are presented:

  • Solid Democratic: Precincts where the Democratic margin (percentage voting for the Democratic candidate minus the percentage voting for the Republican candidate) exceeds 15%.
  • Leaning Democratic: Precincts where the Democratic margin is between 5% and 15%.
  • Balanced: Precincts where the democrat margin is between -5% and 5%.
  • Leaning Republican: Precincts where the Republican margin is between 5% and 15%.
  • Solid Republican: Precincts where the Republican margin exceeds 15%.

2020 Presidential Election Results
Joe Biden 69.93%
Donald Trump 28.57%

Ideological Leanings

Gain deeper insights into the social fabric of the neighborhood with data on self-reported ideological leanings, sourced from MRI-Simmons surveys.

Very Liberal 17.81%
Somewhat Liberal 27.42%
Somewhat Conservative 32.06%
Very Conservative 22.70%

Investment Insights

Value Appreciation Forecast

Our forecast uses the latest area-specific trends and market activities to offer a strategic overview of expected growth across the overall area, rather than for individual homes.

Median Home Value 319,375
5-Year Forecast Median Home Value 343,632
5-Year Appreciation Forecast 7.60%

Rental Viability Analysis

Gain insights into median rent and the rent-to-value ratio to identify promising rental investment opportunities. The 1% rule suggests a property is viable if the monthly rent is at least 1% of its value. Note that using area medians may skew this figure, especially if low-end homes dominate the rental market. Despite this, the ratio is a useful initial indicator for further exploration of rental investments.

Median Monthly Rent 2,041
Median Home Value 319,375
Rent to Value Ratio 0.64%
Leave us a review on Google
Did you find this report useful? Please take a moment to rate us on Google. We appreciate your feedback.

Disclaimer: Due to the dynamic nature of the housing market, the information in this report may not always reflect the most current or precise data. Maptimum is not responsible for any discrepancies or inaccuracies.