This comprehensive research report provides up-to-date and accurate data, along with AI-powered analysis, on the following area:
Address | Surroundings | Created on |
---|---|---|
0.50-mi Radius | 05/28/2024 |
North University: A Comprehensive Analysis
Situated in the North University neighborhood at Laurel Lane, Austin, TX, this area encapsulates the vibrancy of youth, academic rigor, and urban convenience. Historically, North University has been highly influenced by its proximity to the University of Texas at Austin. This neighborhood is frequently characterized by its student-driven dynamism and intellectual edge. Stereotypes often paint it as a collegiate enclave brimming with energy yet occasionally lacking long-term stability due to its transient resident population.
Positive Characteristics:
One of the striking attributes of North University is its youthful vibe, as evidenced by the median age of 23.1 years and a significant 71% of the population comprising young adults aged 20-39. This demographic tilts the neighborhood toward a lively, almost youthful ecosystem brimming with potential for sociable, active lifestyles. The area's high population density (14,730 persons/sq mi) and the notably robust Walk Score of 92 indicate its excellent walkability. Amenities, shops, and cafes are within easy reach, making daily errands and leisure activities convenient without the necessity of a car. Furthermore, with 76% of the populace holding college or graduate degrees, this neighborhood benefits from a highly educated community, often translating into a richer array of intellectual and cultural offerings. The overwhelmingly liberal political climate, demonstrated by 85% voting for Biden in 2020, may also appeal to clients seeking areas aligned with progressive values.
Negative Characteristics:
Despite its many merits, North University is not without its drawbacks. The population growth forecast of -0.44% over five years and a low owner occupancy rate (13%) underscore its transient nature, making it less appealing for those seeking a community with long-term ties and stability. Additionally, the median household income of $29,124 is relatively low, yet juxtaposed against a high median home value of $688,115. It suggests a disparity, potentially making home ownership elusive for many. The property crime index stands at 172, significantly above the national average of 100, indicating a higher risk of property-related crimes. Clients moving into the area should employ enhanced security measures, such as installing home security systems and maintaining vigilance. Furthermore, the high flood hazard risk demands that residents invest in robust flood insurance and consider flood-proofing measures for their homes to mitigate potential severity.
Community, Culture, and Amenities:
The essence of North University extends beyond mere statistics. Local culture is enriched by its academic milieu, with students and faculty often congregating in cafes, bookstores, and cultural events. The neighborhood hosts various festivals and events, not least the UT Austin-associated activities that permeate local culture. Libraries such as the Harry Ransom Center offer world-class resources, while recreational facilities like the Red River Cultural District provide ample nightlife, music venues, and eateries. Streets often bustle with street performances and community gatherings, cementing a sense of conviviality and intellectual exchange. Notable local businesses like Crown & Anchor Pub, Quack's 43rd Street Bakery, and Trudy's North Star further augment the vibrant culinary scene.
Ideal Residents:
Given its unique blend of academic vibrancy and urban amenities, North University is particularly suitable for single young professionals, university students, academics, and those immersed in creative fields. The lively social scene, ample public transportation options, and intellectual atmosphere provide a conducive environment for networking and personal growth. Alternative neighborhoods offering similar benefits include West Campus, Hyde Park, and Mueller. Each of these areas provides urban amenities, youthful energy, and convenient access to resources and events, similar to North University.
Residents Who Might Look Elsewhere:
Families with young children or seniors might find the area less suited to their needs, given the high crime rate and the transient, predominantly young adult population. For families, neighborhoods like Tarrytown, Allandale, or Cherrywood offer quieter, more suburban environments with robust family-oriented amenities, better safety records, and a strong sense of community stability. These areas provide access to quality schools, parks, and recreation facilities that align more with family requirements and senior needs for tranquility and long-term companionship.
Investment Analysis:
From an investment standpoint, North University's appeal is tempered by mixed indicators. The -0.59% five-year value appreciation forecast suggests limited short-term gains. However, its strategic location near a major university and high rental demand ensures steady income flow, despite moderate rental rates ($1,259 median monthly rent). The limited owner occupancy and the value-to-rent ratio further highlight a predominantly rent-driven market, hinting at reliable tenant turnover. Long-term investors should monitor local development plans, educational institution expansion, and evolving urban policies that might enhance property values. The high property crime index remains a concern, though investments in security can partially offset this drawback.
Final Insights:
In summation, North University offers an intellectually stimulating, youth-centric environment teeming with urban conveniences. While its transient demographic and crime rates are notable concerns, proactive measures can mitigate these risks. The neighborhood's proximity to UT Austin ensures perpetual vibrancy and cultural richness, making it an ideal locale for young, educated professionals and students. Careful consideration of individual needs and long-term goals will aid in making an informed decision, ensuring alignment with one’s lifestyle aspirations and financial objectives.
Rising population growth often signals a vibrant, growing community, leading to increased housing demand and potential for value appreciation. However, it's a double-edged sword; rapid growth might stretch local infrastructure and resources, possibly impacting the area's quality of life.
Population | 11,637 |
---|---|
Population (5-Year Projection) | 11,586 |
5-Year Growth Forecast | -0.44% |
Density (Person per Square Mile) | 14,730 |
Density Level | High |
The makeup of households is a valuable insight for those seeking areas that resonate with family-oriented or child-friendly vibes.
Number of Households | 5,156 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Average Household Size | 2.26 | ||||||||
Household Makeup | |||||||||
Families with Kids | 4.05% | ||||||||
Families without Kids | 10.47% | ||||||||
Non-Families | 85.47% |
Age information is helpful for those aiming to align their living environment with their lifestyle preferences—whether you’re drawn to the energy and vibrancy of younger communities or the tranquility and maturity of areas with an older demographic.
Median Age | 23.10 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Age Groups | |||||||||
0-9 Years | 1.97% | ||||||||
10-19 Years | 17.14% | ||||||||
20-34 Years | 67.90% | ||||||||
35-49 Years | 5.92% | ||||||||
50-64 Years | 4.83% | ||||||||
65+ Years | 2.25% |
This breakdown helps pinpoint areas that align with your desire for cultural homogeneity or diversity.
Non-Hispanic White | 55.78% |
---|---|
Hispanic | 17.56% |
Black/African American | 3.07% |
Asian | 19.25% |
Other | 4.34% |
Educational attainment percentages are for individuals aged 25 and older. Higher education levels in a community often correlate with increased civic engagement, safety, and prosperity.
Average Schooling Years | 17.02 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Educational Attainment Breakdown | |||||||||
Less than High School | 1.87% | ||||||||
High School or Some College | 22.58% | ||||||||
College Degree | 47.26% | ||||||||
Graduate/Professional Degree | 28.30% |
This section provides a detailed breakdown of household income levels in the area. Understanding a community's financial standing can reveal insights into its standard of living, economic diversity, and growth potential.
Median Household Income | $29,100 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
On Food Stamps/SNAP | 2.37% | ||||||||
Income Brackets | |||||||||
$0-$25K | 45.44% | ||||||||
$25K-$50K | 19.65% | ||||||||
$50K-$100K | 17.67% | ||||||||
$100K-$200K | 11.15% | ||||||||
$200K+ | 6.09% |
Areas where most houses are owner-occupied (rather than rented) are more desirable because owners are more financially and emotionally invested in their properties and the community's well-being. High vacancy rates are a negative indicator, as they can signal that the area is in decline.
Total Housing Units | 5,693 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Occupancy | |||||||||
Owner Occupied | 13.23% | ||||||||
Renter Occupied | 77.34% | ||||||||
Vacant | 9.43% |
The availability of subsidized housing can influence neighborhood property values.
Main Types of Subsidized Housing:
In the table below, Properties refer to distinct parcels of land or buildings designated as low-income housing. Units are the individual housing units (such as apartments) within those properties.
Total Properties | 0 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Closest Property (mi) | - | ||||||||
Total Units | 0 | ||||||||
Units per Square Mile | 0.00 | ||||||||
Property Types | |||||||||
Public Housing | - | ||||||||
Section 8 | - | ||||||||
LIHTC | - |
Understanding a neighborhood's land cover helps you evaluate the aesthetic appeal, potential for recreational activities, and the balance of natural versus developed spaces.
Concise descriptions for each land cover category:
Landscaped Areas | 15.47% |
---|---|
Residential Areas | 57.76% |
Urban & Commercial | 26.78% |
Water Bodies | 0.00% |
Wooded Areas | 0.00% |
Wild Vegetation | 0.00% |
Farms & Gardens | 0.00% |
Marshes & Swamps | 0.00% |
Crime Indexes compare local safety to a national average set at 100. For example, a crime index of 200 means the area has double the national average crime rate. Remember, the national average includes quieter rural areas, so urban centers may naturally show higher indexes.
Total Crime Index | 159 |
---|---|
Property Crime Index | 172 |
Personal Crime Index | 88 |
Government agencies release national fatal car accident data with a two-year delay. Extra caution is recommended in areas with higher accident frequencies.
You can see the exact location of fatal accidents on the map:
Data Period | 2019-2022 |
---|---|
All Fatal Accidents | 0 |
Annual Fatal Accidents per Square Mile | 0.00 |
Involving DUI | - |
This section provides detailed information from the Sex Offender Registry, including names, addresses, and specific convictions, to enhance your neighborhood safety awareness.
Total Sex Offenders | 3 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sex Offenders per Square Mile | 3.80 | ||||||||
Closest Sex Offender (mi) | 0.14 | ||||||||
Conviction Type | |||||||||
Offense Against Children | 2 | ||||||||
Rape | 0 | ||||||||
Sexual Battery | 0 | ||||||||
Other Offense | 1 |
In many areas, students' options for attending public schools are determined by their residential address, linking them to specific school districts. Consequently, the quality of the schools within these districts plays a crucial role in shaping the educational outcomes of students. Additionally, high-performing school districts often indicate a strong community commitment to education, which can reflect positively on the neighborhood's overall desirability.
On the map, you will find the school districts that intersect with your selected area, along with detailed information about the nearby schools within each district.
Main District | Austin ISD |
---|---|
Grade Range | PK-12 |
Number of Schools | 124 |
Number of Students | 73,384 |
Student/Teacher Ratio | 16.55 |
State Rank | 568 out of 968 |
State Rank Percentile | 41.32% |
Other Nearby Districts | - |
Name | Level | District | Distance (mi) | Students | State Rank Percentile | Student/Teacher Ratio | On Lunch Subsidy | White | Hispanic | Black | Asian |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lee Elementary | Elementary (K-6) | Austin ISD | 0.67 | 458 | 91.31% | 14.50 | 21.62% | 65.50% | 18.34% | 2.40% | 7.42% |
Bryker Woods Elementary | Elementary (K-5) | Austin ISD | 0.98 | 293 | 96.84% | 13.30 | 9.90% | 64.51% | 19.45% | 2.05% | 4.44% |
Maplewood Elementary | Elementary (PK-5) | Austin ISD | 1.40 | 402 | 81.32% | 14.30 | 28.86% | 50.00% | 31.59% | 7.46% | 2.24% |
Ridgetop Elementary | Elementary (PK-5) | Austin ISD | 1.64 | 367 | 93.61% | 15.20 | 19.07% | 40.05% | 47.68% | 2.18% | 3.00% |
Garza Independence High School | High (10-12) | Austin ISD | 1.67 | 150 | - | 5.70 | 45.33% | 39.33% | 44.00% | 8.67% | 3.33% |
Campbell Elementary | Elementary (PK-5) | Austin ISD | 1.74 | 185 | 12.09% | 15.40 | 71.35% | 21.08% | 27.57% | 40.00% | 6.49% |
Casis Elementary | Elementary (PK-5) | Austin ISD | 1.73 | 599 | 96.69% | 14.60 | 7.51% | 76.13% | 13.36% | 1.00% | 3.67% |
Mathews Elementary | Elementary (PK-6) | Austin ISD | 1.88 | 345 | 91.26% | 17.00 | 31.88% | 44.06% | 35.65% | 6.96% | 5.80% |
Austin St Hospital | Middle (5-11) | Austin ISD | 2.03 | 11 | - | 1.80 | 27.27% | 45.45% | 27.27% | 18.18% | 0.00% |
Kealing Middle | Middle (6-8) | Austin ISD | 2.03 | 1,255 | 91.29% | 18.10 | 29.56% | 37.85% | 29.48% | 10.28% | 15.30% |
McCallum High School | High (9-12) | Austin ISD | 2.10 | 1,824 | 88.17% | 18.60 | 22.92% | 57.73% | 28.95% | 6.03% | 2.08% |
Blackshear Elementary | Elementary (PK-5) | Austin ISD | 2.25 | 262 | 44.72% | 13.70 | 54.20% | 24.05% | 42.75% | 22.90% | 1.15% |
O Henry Middle | Middle (6-8) | Austin ISD | 2.29 | 754 | 80.82% | 16.80 | 28.91% | 56.50% | 36.34% | 3.45% | 0.93% |
Austin High School | High (9-12) | Austin ISD | 2.37 | 2,317 | 83.99% | 20.00 | 24.51% | 53.78% | 35.56% | 2.85% | 2.46% |
Reilly Elementary | Elementary (PK-5) | Austin ISD | 2.40 | 344 | 68.00% | 17.20 | 36.05% | 29.07% | 56.69% | 1.45% | 4.94% |
General Marshall Middle | Middle (6-8) | Austin ISD | 2.59 | 0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Eastside Early College High School | High (9-12) | Austin ISD | 2.60 | 699 | 9.74% | 19.90 | 80.97% | 2.43% | 80.54% | 15.45% | 0.86% |
For families seeking alternatives to traditional public schools, several options are available:
The map displays nearby charter, magnet, and private schools (if any) along with key information about each.
Name | Level | Type | Faith Affiliation | Coed | Distance (mi) | Students | State Rank Percentile | Student/Teacher Ratio | On Lunch Subsidy | White | Hispanic | Black | Asian |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Kirby Hall School | Private (PK-12) | Private | Nonsectarian | Coed | 0.24 | 98 | - | 5.40 | - | 69.39% | 5.10% | 1.02% | 5.10% |
All Saints Episcopal Day School Austin | Private (PK-K) | Private | Episcopal | Coed | 0.37 | 60 | - | 2.60 | - | 8.33% | 5.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Helping Hand | Elementary (K-7) | Charter | - | - | 0.38 | 22 | 0.54% | 7.30 | - | 50.00% | 22.73% | 27.27% | 0.00% |
Hyde Park School | Private (PK-12) | Private | Baptist | Coed | 0.51 | 757 | - | 9.40 | - | 83.09% | 5.28% | 1.19% | 1.85% |
Ahb Community School | Private (K-8) | Private | Nonsectarian | Coed | 0.58 | 72 | - | 9.00 | - | 73.61% | 13.89% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
St Andrew's Episcopal School | Private (K-12) | Private | Episcopal | Coed | 0.71 | 973 | - | 7.40 | - | 75.03% | 7.40% | 2.36% | 3.91% |
Hyde Park Montessori | Private (PK-K) | Private | Nonsectarian | Coed | 0.74 | 40 | - | 4.00 | - | 7.50% | 2.50% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Ace Academy | Private (K-8) | Private | Nonsectarian | Coed | 0.97 | 65 | - | 4.00 | - | 67.69% | 6.15% | 6.15% | 9.23% |
Long-View Micro School | Private (2-8) | Private | Nonsectarian | Coed | 0.98 | 75 | - | 6.00 | - | 62.67% | 0.00% | 5.33% | 12.00% |
Odyssey School | Private (5-12) | Private | Nonsectarian | Coed | 1.18 | 56 | - | 4.70 | - | 75.00% | 12.50% | 5.36% | 5.36% |
Huntington-Surrey High School | Private (9-12) | Private | Nonsectarian | Coed | 1.43 | 34 | - | 4.20 | - | 88.24% | 2.94% | 0.00% | 8.82% |
Girls' School Of Austin | Private (K-8) | Private | Nonsectarian | Girls | 1.56 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Griffin School | Private (9-12) | Private | Nonsectarian | Coed | 1.56 | 151 | - | 6.60 | - | 72.19% | 13.91% | 3.97% | 7.28% |
Austin Independent School District (Isd) Prek Partnership (Pkp) | Elementary (PK) | Charter | - | - | 1.56 | 92 | - | - | 88.04% | 17.39% | 59.78% | 18.48% | 1.09% |
The Austin School For Performing And Visual Arts | Private (7-12) | Private | Nonsectarian | Coed | 1.59 | 21 | - | 9.10 | - | 66.67% | 23.81% | 4.76% | 0.00% |
Learn4life-Austin | High (9-12) | Charter | - | - | 1.78 | 0 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Cathedral School Of St Mary | Private (PK-8) | Private | Roman Catholic | Coed | 1.79 | 170 | - | 9.80 | - | 14.12% | 75.29% | 1.18% | 0.00% |
Headwaters School | Private (PK-12) | Private | Nonsectarian | Coed | 1.81 | 501 | - | 8.80 | - | 59.48% | 9.58% | 1.80% | 3.59% |
Rawson-Saunders-Austin Area School For Dyslexics | Private (2-12) | Private | Nonsectarian | Coed | 1.80 | 199 | - | 3.30 | - | 91.46% | 4.52% | 2.01% | 1.51% |
Good Shepherd Episcopal School | Private (PK-K) | Private | Episcopal | Coed | 1.86 | 163 | - | 7.00 | - | 11.04% | 1.84% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Acton Academy | Private (1-12) | Private | Nonsectarian | Coed | 1.86 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Academy Of Thought And Industry Austin | Private (6-12) | Private | Nonsectarian | Coed | 2.28 | 52 | - | 5.30 | - | 76.92% | 9.62% | 7.69% | 5.77% |
Texans Can Academy - Austin | High (9-12) | Charter | - | - | 2.42 | 265 | 3.16% | 18.60 | 85.66% | 3.77% | 81.89% | 12.45% | 0.75% |
Casa Montessori Child Development Center | Private (PK-K) | Private | Nonsectarian | Coed | 2.44 | 57 | - | 4.60 | - | 14.04% | 5.26% | 1.75% | 0.00% |
Northwest Montessori House, Inc | Private (PK-K) | Private | Nonsectarian | Coed | 2.51 | 52 | - | 7.00 | - | 36.54% | 9.62% | 5.77% | 1.92% |
Ascent: An Acton Academy | Private (PK-5) | Private | Nonsectarian | Coed | 2.52 | 65 | - | 9.10 | - | 72.31% | 0.00% | 3.08% | 9.23% |
Capitol School Of Austin | Private (PK-5) | Private | Nonsectarian | Coed | 2.57 | 64 | - | 5.30 | - | 42.19% | 15.62% | 0.00% | 3.12% |
Air quality directly impacts health, with pollution linked to multiple health concerns. Air quality can vary within a day and seasonally. Our analysis uses hourly data from the past 365 days, highlighting the percentage of time the Air Quality Index (AQI) and specific pollutants were in the dangerous range.
Poor or Very Poor Air Quality | 0.57% | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Worst Month | September | ||||||||
Major Pollutant | O3 | ||||||||
Pollutants | |||||||||
Bad or Very Bad SO2 | 0.00% | ||||||||
Bad or Very Bad NO2 | 0.00% | ||||||||
Bad or Very Bad PM10 | 0.00% | ||||||||
Bad or Very Bad PM2.5 | 0.00% | ||||||||
Bad or Very Bad O3 | 0.09% | ||||||||
Bad or Very Bad CO | 0.00% |
A Soundscore™ rating, ranging from 50 (indicating high noise levels) to 100 (signifying low noise levels), measures the environmental noise of a location, providing a quantifiable insight into the auditory environment you can expect.
Sound Score | 74 (Active) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sources of Noise | |||||||||
Airports | Calm | ||||||||
Vehicular Traffic | Active | ||||||||
Local Commercial and Community | Active |
Using Peak Ground Acceleration (PGA) data from the US Geological Survey (USGS), this section forecasts the potential earthquake impact and damage likelihood in the area over the next 50 years, offering vital insights into seismic risks.
PGA | 0.02 |
---|---|
Earthquake Risk | No Risk |
The flood risk data, sourced from FEMA, assess the likelihood and potential impacts of flooding by considering various factors including flood frequency, proximity to water bodies, and property characteristics like elevation and rebuilding costs.
On the map, areas are designated as high risk or moderate risk:
Has High-Risk Zones | Yes |
---|---|
Closest High-Risk Zone (mi) | 0.06 |
Has Moderate-Risk Zones | Yes |
The Walk Score, ranging from 0 to 100, gauges an address's accessibility on foot—the higher the score, the easier it is to accomplish daily errands without a car.
Similarly, the Bike Score evaluates an area's suitability for cycling based on infrastructure, topography, proximity to key destinations, road connectivity, and the cycling community's presence.
Walk Score® | 92 (Walker's Paradise) |
---|---|
Bike Score® | 87 (Very Bikeable) |
Gain insights into the area's potential for connections, dating, and finding life partners. This section explores the social landscape, highlighting marital status for residents 15 years and older and detailing the female-to-male ratio for those aged 20 to 44. A ratio above 1 indicates more women than men, suggesting enhanced dating prospects for men, and vice versa.
Marrital Status | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Single, Never Married | 84.52% | ||||||||
Married | 12.68% | ||||||||
Other | 2.81% | ||||||||
Female to Male Ratio | 0.87 |
Pets, especially dogs, provide a great way for locals to interact and build connections. If you have pets, you'll likely enjoy living in an area with a high percentage of fellow pet owners.
Has Any Pet | 44.45% |
---|---|
Has Dog(s) | 23.97% |
Has Cat(s) | 20.48% |
Living in a community that shares your values can be important. Our detailed analysis of Presidential Election results at the precinct level—the most granular unit for voting data—allows you to understand the political tendencies of the area.
On the map, the precicits that intersect with your selected area, along with their vote count in the 2020 election, are presented:
2020 Presidential Election Results | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Joe Biden | 85.29% | ||||||||
Donald Trump | 12.57% |
Gain deeper insights into the social fabric of the neighborhood with data on self-reported ideological leanings, sourced from MRI-Simmons surveys.
Very Liberal | 31.51% |
---|---|
Somewhat Liberal | 38.21% |
Somewhat Conservative | 19.65% |
Very Conservative | 10.63% |
Our forecast uses the latest area-specific trends and market activities to offer a strategic overview of expected growth across the overall area, rather than for individual homes.
Median Home Value | 688,115 |
---|---|
5-Year Forecast Median Home Value | 684,028 |
5-Year Appreciation Forecast | -0.59% |
Gain insights into median rent and the rent-to-value ratio to identify promising rental investment opportunities. The 1% rule suggests a property is viable if the monthly rent is at least 1% of its value. Note that using area medians may skew this figure, especially if low-end homes dominate the rental market. Despite this, the ratio is a useful initial indicator for further exploration of rental investments.
Median Monthly Rent | 1,573 |
---|---|
Median Home Value | 688,115 |
Rent to Value Ratio | 0.23% |
The Desirability Score measures how closely an area approaches a "perfect" neighborhood. This ideal is characterized by no crime or safety concerns, top-tier schools, a highly-educated population, no noise or air pollution, no risk of earthquakes or floods, high walkability, and a harmonious mix of nature and development.
The score ranges from 0 to 100, with a higher score indicating closer alignment to this ideal.
Desirability Score | 55.18 |
---|
The Bang for the Buck Index measures the ratio of the expected cost of a neighborhood based on its characteristics to its actual cost. An index close to 1 implies that the neighborhood's value is on par with its qualities.
An index greater than 1 indicates that the area offers excellent value for what it provides, while an index less than 1 suggests that the area may be overpriced.
Note that this measure is estimated relative to the entire US housing market, not just the local market.
Bang for the Buck | 41.20 |
---|
Disclaimer: Due to the dynamic nature of the housing market, the information in this report may not always reflect the most current or precise data. Maptimum is not responsible for any discrepancies or inaccuracies.