This comprehensive research report provides up-to-date and accurate data, along with AI-powered analysis, on the following area:
Address | Surroundings | Created on |
---|---|---|
5.00-mi Radius | 08/07/2024 |
Measures how closely a neighborhood matches an ideal location, ignoring cost. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better suitability for the typical homebuyer.
Measures the quality of life relative to cost. Scores range from 0 to 100; a score above 50 indicates good value, while below 50 suggests the area may be overpriced.
36/100Rising population growth often signals a vibrant, growing community, leading to increased housing demand and potential for value appreciation. However, it's a double-edged sword; rapid growth might stretch local infrastructure and resources, possibly impacting the area's quality of life.
Population | 218,909 |
---|---|
Population (5-Year Projection) | 226,327 |
5-Year Growth Forecast | 3.39% |
Density (Person per Square Mile) | 2,787 |
Density Level | Medium |
The makeup of households is a valuable insight for those seeking areas that resonate with family-oriented or child-friendly vibes.
Number of Households | 60,113 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Average Household Size | 3.64 | ||||||||
Household Makeup | |||||||||
Families with Kids | 43.79% | ||||||||
Families without Kids | 33.19% | ||||||||
Non-Families | 23.02% |
Age information is helpful for those aiming to align their living environment with their lifestyle preferences—whether you’re drawn to the energy and vibrancy of younger communities or the tranquility and maturity of areas with an older demographic.
Median Age | 33.70 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Age Groups | |||||||||
0-9 Years | 13.08% | ||||||||
10-19 Years | 15.02% | ||||||||
20-34 Years | 23.93% | ||||||||
35-49 Years | 19.64% | ||||||||
50-64 Years | 16.61% | ||||||||
65+ Years | 11.71% |
This breakdown helps pinpoint areas that align with your desire for cultural homogeneity or diversity.
Non-Hispanic White | 12.58% |
---|---|
Hispanic | 62.26% |
Black/African American | 14.48% |
Asian | 6.40% |
Other | 4.29% |
Educational attainment percentages are for individuals aged 25 and older. Higher education levels in a community often correlate with increased civic engagement, safety, and prosperity.
Average Schooling Years | 13.84 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Educational Attainment Breakdown | |||||||||
Less than High School | 18.03% | ||||||||
High School or Some College | 61.52% | ||||||||
College Degree | 13.62% | ||||||||
Graduate/Professional Degree | 6.83% |
This section provides a detailed breakdown of household income levels in the area. Understanding a community's financial standing can reveal insights into its standard of living, economic diversity, and growth potential.
Median Household Income | $86,600 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
On Food Stamps/SNAP | 12.00% | ||||||||
Income Brackets | |||||||||
$0-$25K | 9.21% | ||||||||
$25K-$50K | 14.13% | ||||||||
$50K-$100K | 33.69% | ||||||||
$100K-$200K | 34.37% | ||||||||
$200K+ | 8.60% |
Areas where most houses are owner-occupied (rather than rented) are more desirable because owners are more financially and emotionally invested in their properties and the community's well-being. High vacancy rates are a negative indicator, as they can signal that the area is in decline.
Total Housing Units | 61,988 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Occupancy | |||||||||
Owner Occupied | 59.58% | ||||||||
Renter Occupied | 37.40% | ||||||||
Vacant | 3.02% |
Reviewing the age of structures helps you understand the mix of modern and historic structures, anticipate the longevity of the infrastructure, and make informed investment decisions based on the area's growth and evolution.
Median Year Built | 1987 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Age Breakdown | |||||||||
New (Since 2020) | 0.24% | ||||||||
Recent (2010-2019) | 4.54% | ||||||||
Mid-Age (1980-2009) | 69.99% | ||||||||
Old (Before 1980) | 25.23% |
The availability of subsidized housing can influence neighborhood property values.
Main Types of Subsidized Housing:
In the table below, Properties refer to distinct parcels of land or buildings designated as low-income housing. Units are the individual housing units (such as apartments) within those properties.
Total Properties | 11 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Closest Property (mi) | 0.03 | ||||||||
Total Units | 915 | ||||||||
Units per Square Mile | 11.65 | ||||||||
Property Types | |||||||||
Public Housing | - | ||||||||
Section 8 | 1 (74 Units) | ||||||||
LIHTC | 10 (841 Units) |
Understanding a neighborhood's land cover helps you evaluate the aesthetic appeal, potential for recreational activities, and the balance of natural versus developed spaces.
Concise descriptions for each land cover category:
Landscaped Areas | 11.47% |
---|---|
Residential Areas | 28.64% |
Urban & Commercial | 0.88% |
Water Bodies | 0.04% |
Wooded Areas | 0.00% |
Wild Vegetation | 51.20% |
Farms & Gardens | 7.61% |
Marshes & Swamps | 0.02% |
Crime Indexes compare local safety to a national average set at 100. For example, a crime index of 200 means the area has double the national average crime rate. Remember, the national average includes quieter rural areas, so urban centers may naturally show higher indexes.
Total Crime Index | 119 |
---|---|
Property Crime Index | 123 |
Personal Crime Index | 97 |
Government agencies release national fatal car accident data with a two-year delay. Extra caution is recommended in areas with higher accident frequencies.
You can see the exact location of fatal accidents on the map:
Data Period | 2019-2022 |
---|---|
All Fatal Accidents | 85 |
Annual Fatal Accidents per Square Mile | 0.27 |
Involving DUI | 31.76% |
This section provides detailed information from the Sex Offender Registry, including names, addresses, and specific convictions, to enhance your neighborhood safety awareness.
Total Sex Offenders | 259 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sex Offenders per Square Mile | 3.30 | ||||||||
Closest Sex Offender (mi) | 0.42 | ||||||||
Conviction Type | |||||||||
Offense Against Children | 166 | ||||||||
Rape | 35 | ||||||||
Sexual Battery | 26 | ||||||||
Other Offense | 32 |
In many areas, students' options for attending public schools are determined by their residential address, linking them to specific school districts. Consequently, the quality of the schools within these districts plays a crucial role in shaping the educational outcomes of students. Additionally, high-performing school districts often indicate a strong community commitment to education, which can reflect positively on the neighborhood's overall desirability.
On the map, you will find the school districts that intersect with your selected area, along with detailed information about the nearby schools within each district.
Main District | Moreno Valley Unified School District |
---|---|
Grade Range | K-12 |
Number of Schools | 37 |
Number of Students | 31,653 |
Student/Teacher Ratio | 21.48 |
State Rank | 1231 out of 1563 |
State Rank Percentile | 21.24% |
Other Nearby Districts | Val Verde Unified School District, Riverside Unified School District, Beaumont Unified School District, Redlands Unified School District, Colton Joint Unified School District |
Name | Level | District | Distance (mi) | Students | State Rank Percentile | Student/Teacher Ratio | On Lunch Subsidy | White | Hispanic | Black | Asian |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cloverdale Elementary | Elementary (K-5) | Moreno Valley Unified | 0.76 | 728 | 8.84% | 23.00 | 73.90% | 5.91% | 76.10% | 9.07% | 3.02% |
North Ridge Elementary | Elementary (K-5) | Moreno Valley Unified | 0.78 | 730 | 66.99% | 23.90 | 43.84% | 15.48% | 66.44% | 8.77% | 2.60% |
Midland Elementary | Elementary (K-5) | Moreno Valley Unified | 1.02 | 582 | 7.71% | 23.70 | 81.27% | 6.01% | 77.66% | 11.51% | 0.69% |
Sunnymead Middle | Middle (6-8) | Moreno Valley Unified | 1.07 | 1,193 | 6.42% | 20.00 | 78.12% | 2.68% | 80.39% | 10.73% | 1.51% |
Palm Middle | Middle (6-8) | Moreno Valley Unified | 1.08 | 1,014 | 39.44% | 19.10 | 71.30% | 8.38% | 72.98% | 12.13% | 2.17% |
March Mountain High | High (9-12) | Moreno Valley Unified | 1.09 | 221 | 17.25% | 12.60 | 75.57% | 2.26% | 81.00% | 12.22% | 0.45% |
Sunnymead Elementary | Elementary (K-5) | Moreno Valley Unified | 1.15 | 696 | 8.67% | 22.00 | 82.61% | 2.87% | 83.76% | 9.05% | 1.29% |
Butterfield Language Academy | Elementary (K-8) | Moreno Valley Unified | 1.31 | 954 | 34.92% | 20.50 | 71.70% | 3.77% | 85.43% | 7.13% | 1.15% |
Bear Valley Elementary | Elementary (K-5) | Moreno Valley Unified | 1.38 | 786 | 48.77% | 23.60 | 71.37% | 5.34% | 67.94% | 14.38% | 6.23% |
Ramona Elementary | Elementary (K-6) | Moreno Valley Unified | 1.52 | 551 | 15.82% | 22.40 | 79.31% | 2.00% | 85.66% | 8.35% | 0.73% |
Creekside Elementary | Elementary (K-5) | Moreno Valley Unified | 1.59 | 609 | 12.85% | 21.70 | 65.68% | 4.27% | 80.95% | 10.34% | 1.48% |
Honey Hollow Elementary | Elementary (K-5) | Moreno Valley Unified | 1.60 | 615 | 21.65% | 23.60 | 78.54% | 3.41% | 74.63% | 15.93% | 0.81% |
Sugar Hill Elementary | Elementary (K-5) | Moreno Valley Unified | 1.67 | 633 | 47.94% | 23.80 | 65.09% | 10.27% | 66.19% | 16.11% | 0.95% |
Sunnymeadows Elementary | Elementary (K-5) | Moreno Valley Unified | 1.72 | 556 | 15.58% | 22.20 | 83.27% | 5.22% | 77.52% | 11.15% | 1.08% |
Moreno Valley High | High (9-12) | Moreno Valley Unified | 1.90 | 2,232 | 50.85% | 20.80 | 74.91% | 2.73% | 82.71% | 9.81% | 1.66% |
Mountain View Middle | Middle (6-8) | Moreno Valley Unified | 1.92 | 1,232 | 26.59% | 22.10 | 63.47% | 4.87% | 75.08% | 13.72% | 2.68% |
Hendrick Ranch Elementary | Elementary (K-5) | Moreno Valley Unified | 2.08 | 533 | 15.76% | 23.60 | 75.98% | 3.94% | 75.80% | 14.26% | 2.44% |
Canyon Springs High | High (9-12) | Moreno Valley Unified | 2.18 | 2,266 | 57.20% | 22.00 | 61.03% | 8.52% | 70.12% | 13.33% | 2.38% |
Valley View High | High (9-12) | Moreno Valley Unified | 2.20 | 2,843 | 54.56% | 22.70 | 60.89% | 7.21% | 71.97% | 12.42% | 4.26% |
Moreno Elementary | Elementary (K-6) | Moreno Valley Unified | 2.21 | 478 | 20.84% | 20.70 | 71.76% | 3.77% | 69.04% | 15.27% | 5.02% |
Bayside Community Day | High (7-12) | Moreno Valley Unified | 2.32 | 144 | 13.84% | 14.40 | 69.44% | 6.25% | 80.56% | 11.81% | 0.00% |
Vista Heights Middle | Middle (6-8) | Moreno Valley Unified | 2.41 | 1,382 | 43.18% | 21.80 | 58.18% | 7.81% | 69.90% | 14.69% | 2.68% |
Chaparral Hills Elementary | Elementary (K-5) | Moreno Valley Unified | 2.46 | 589 | 33.25% | 22.10 | 81.66% | 3.74% | 80.65% | 8.83% | 0.85% |
Badger Springs Middle | Middle (6-8) | Moreno Valley Unified | 2.46 | 1,059 | 13.45% | 20.40 | 77.15% | 1.61% | 86.59% | 8.50% | 1.32% |
Serrano Elementary | Elementary (K-6) | Moreno Valley Unified | 2.53 | 446 | 33.93% | 22.20 | 83.86% | 5.16% | 82.96% | 6.50% | 2.02% |
TownGate Elementary | Elementary (K-5) | Moreno Valley Unified | 2.56 | 713 | 36.48% | 23.50 | 76.72% | 4.77% | 62.97% | 18.09% | 6.17% |
Box Springs Elementary | Elementary (K-6) | Moreno Valley Unified | 2.64 | 434 | 24.58% | 20.60 | 75.81% | 7.37% | 66.36% | 17.51% | 1.84% |
Armada Elementary | Elementary (K-5) | Moreno Valley Unified | 2.80 | 779 | 34.85% | 21.90 | 85.88% | 2.70% | 82.28% | 10.40% | 0.77% |
Edgemont Elementary | Elementary (K-5) | Moreno Valley Unified | 3.10 | 541 | 1.97% | 21.40 | 87.43% | 1.48% | 83.36% | 9.24% | 1.29% |
Vista del Lago High | High (9-12) | Moreno Valley Unified | 3.18 | 2,093 | 53.79% | 21.50 | 68.18% | 3.54% | 77.93% | 11.94% | 2.77% |
Hidden Springs Elementary | Elementary (K-5) | Moreno Valley Unified | 3.28 | 578 | 56.81% | 23.10 | 57.61% | 11.76% | 69.20% | 11.42% | 2.08% |
March Middle | Middle (6-8) | Val Verde Unified | 3.57 | 758 | 33.23% | 20.90 | 88.26% | 3.96% | 75.46% | 14.25% | 2.90% |
Victoriano Elementary | Elementary (K-5) | Val Verde Unified | 3.64 | 673 | 60.81% | 25.50 | 81.87% | 2.82% | 59.29% | 26.00% | 6.09% |
Rainbow Ridge Elementary | Elementary (K-5) | Val Verde Unified | 3.69 | 712 | 17.99% | 20.70 | 90.87% | 4.78% | 78.65% | 9.69% | 3.37% |
For families seeking alternatives to traditional public schools, several options are available:
The map displays nearby charter, magnet, and private schools (if any) along with key information about each.
Name | Level | Type | Faith Affiliation | Coed | Distance (mi) | Students | State Rank Percentile | Student/Teacher Ratio | On Lunch Subsidy | White | Hispanic | Black | Asian |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Valley Adventist Christian School | Private (1-8) | Private | Seventh-Day Adventist | Coed | 0.50 | 20 | - | 10.00 | - | 5.00% | 75.00% | 20.00% | 0.00% |
Shepherd Of The Valley School | Private (PK-K) | Private | Lutheran Church - Missouri Synod | Coed | 0.68 | 53 | - | 8.00 | - | 3.77% | 1.89% | 7.55% | 0.00% |
Cornerstone Fellowship Academy | Private (1-12) | Private | Christian (no specific denomination) | Coed | 0.90 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Country Day School | Private (2-12) | Private | Nonsectarian | Coed | 1.26 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Leadership Military Academy | High (9-12) | Charter | - | - | 1.47 | 143 | 26.45% | 9.90 | 75.52% | 4.90% | 66.43% | 21.68% | 0.00% |
Journey | Elementary (K-6) | Charter | - | - | 1.80 | 550 | 27.09% | 25.50 | 80.91% | 4.00% | 49.64% | 38.36% | 1.27% |
Audeo Valley Charter | High (6-12) | Charter | - | - | 2.47 | 239 | 38.16% | 39.90 | 73.22% | 8.79% | 65.27% | 18.41% | 2.51% |
Valley Christian Academy | Private (PK-8) | Private | Other | Coed | 2.70 | 139 | - | 12.50 | - | 65.47% | 7.91% | 10.79% | 0.00% |
Immanuel House Institute Of Higher Learning | Private (9-12) | Private | Nonsectarian | Boys | 2.86 | 55 | - | 18.30 | - | 7.27% | 45.45% | 45.45% | 0.00% |
Garvey/Allen Visual & Performing Arts Academy for STEM | Middle (5-8) | Charter | - | - | 2.90 | 157 | 28.98% | 22.50 | 71.97% | 0.64% | 19.75% | 70.70% | 0.00% |
Jan Peterson Child Day Care Center | Private (PK-K) | Private | Nonsectarian | Coed | 2.92 | 116 | - | 8.60 | - | 3.45% | 6.03% | 5.17% | 2.59% |
Calvary Chapel Christian School | Private (PK-12) | Private | Christian (no specific denomination) | Coed | 3.24 | 153 | - | 15.00 | - | 41.18% | 36.60% | 9.80% | 10.46% |
Clean drinking water is essential for good health. Under the Safe Drinking Water Act, water systems are required to meet strict safety regulations. Maptimum’s Water Health Score assesses water systems based on the following key factors:
Remember, water systems often cover entire cities or regions, so moving within the same area may not significantly change your water quality.
Water System | EASTERN MUNICIPAL WD | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Water Health Score | 4.45 / 5 Good | ||||||||
Population Served | 637,387 | ||||||||
Primary Source | Surface water purchased | ||||||||
Lead and Copper (Latest Sampling) | |||||||||
Lead (Pb) | 0.0020 mg/L Safe | ||||||||
Copper (Cu) | No Data | ||||||||
Serious Violations (Last 5 Years) | |||||||||
Health Based | 0 | ||||||||
Monitoring/Reporting | 0 | ||||||||
Not Yet Resolved | 0 |
Air quality directly impacts health, with pollution linked to multiple health concerns. Air quality can vary within a day and seasonally. Our analysis uses hourly data from the past 365 days, highlighting the percentage of time the Air Quality Index (AQI) and specific pollutants were in the dangerous range.
Poor or Very Poor Air Quality | 28.17% | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Worst Month | July | ||||||||
Major Pollutant | O3 | ||||||||
Pollutants | |||||||||
Bad or Very Bad SO2 | 0.00% | ||||||||
Bad or Very Bad NO2 | 0.01% | ||||||||
Bad or Very Bad PM10 | 0.55% | ||||||||
Bad or Very Bad PM2.5 | 7.14% | ||||||||
Bad or Very Bad O3 | 20.88% | ||||||||
Bad or Very Bad CO | 0.00% |
Hazardous waste sites near your home can pollute air, soil, and water, posing health risks like respiratory issues, contaminated drinking water, and long-term exposure to hazardous chemicals. Even compliant facilities, when densely clustered, can create cumulative environmental impacts that affect quality of life and property values.
We consider a facility high-risk based on a combination of the following criteria:
All Sites | 500 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
High-Risk Sites | 41 | ||||||||
High-Risk Sites per Square Mile | 0.52 | ||||||||
Closest High-Risk Site (mi) | 0.19 | ||||||||
Facility Types | |||||||||
Active | 461 | ||||||||
Transport | 16 | ||||||||
Large Quantity Generator | 40 | ||||||||
TSDFs | 0 | ||||||||
With Recent Violations | 2 |
A Soundscore™ rating, ranging from 50 (indicating high noise levels) to 100 (signifying low noise levels), measures the environmental noise of a location, providing a quantifiable insight into the auditory environment you can expect.
Sound Score | 69 (Active) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sources of Noise | |||||||||
Airports | Calm | ||||||||
Vehicular Traffic | Busy | ||||||||
Local Commercial and Community | Active |
This section utilizes Peak Ground Acceleration (PGA) data from the US Geological Survey (USGS) to forecast the maximum potential earthquake intensity and damage with a 2% probability of being exceeded in the area over the next 50 years, providing valuable insights into seismic risks.
PGA | 0.83 |
---|---|
Earthquake Risk | High |
The flood risk data, sourced from FEMA, assess the likelihood and potential impacts of flooding by considering various factors including flood frequency, proximity to water bodies, and property characteristics like elevation and rebuilding costs.
On the map, areas are designated as high risk or moderate risk:
Has High-Risk Zones | Yes (Type: AE, A) |
---|---|
Closest High-Risk Zone (mi) | 0.19 |
Has Moderate-Risk Zones | Yes (Type: X) |
The Walk Score, ranging from 0 to 100, gauges an address's accessibility on foot—the higher the score, the easier it is to accomplish daily errands without a car.
Similarly, the Bike Score evaluates an area's suitability for cycling based on infrastructure, topography, proximity to key destinations, road connectivity, and the cycling community's presence.
Walk Score® | 70 (Somewhat Walkable) |
---|---|
Bike Score® | 46 (Somewhat Bikeable) |
Gain insights into the area's potential for connections, dating, and finding life partners. This section explores the social landscape, highlighting marital status for residents 15 years and older and detailing the female-to-male ratio for those aged 20 to 44. A ratio above 1 indicates more women than men, suggesting enhanced dating prospects for men, and vice versa.
Marrital Status | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Single, Never Married | 43.61% | ||||||||
Married | 46.04% | ||||||||
Other | 10.35% | ||||||||
Female to Male Ratio | 0.96 |
Pets, especially dogs, provide a great way for locals to interact and build connections. If you have pets, you'll likely enjoy living in an area with a high percentage of fellow pet owners.
Has Any Pet | 48.17% |
---|---|
Has Dog(s) | 39.64% |
Has Cat(s) | 18.22% |
Living in a community that shares your values can be important. Our detailed analysis of Presidential Election results at the precinct level—the most granular unit for voting data—allows you to understand the political tendencies of the area.
On the map, the precicits that intersect with your selected area, along with their vote count in the 2020 election, are presented:
2020 Presidential Election Results | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Joe Biden | 64.20% | ||||||||
Donald Trump | 33.80% |
Gain deeper insights into the social fabric of the neighborhood with data on self-reported ideological leanings, sourced from MRI-Simmons surveys.
Very Liberal | 18.81% |
---|---|
Somewhat Liberal | 29.41% |
Somewhat Conservative | 30.32% |
Very Conservative | 21.47% |
Our forecast uses the latest area-specific trends and market activities to offer a strategic overview of expected growth across the overall area, rather than for individual homes.
Median Home Value | 510,030 |
---|---|
5-Year Forecast Median Home Value | 631,271 |
5-Year Appreciation Forecast | 23.77% |
Gain insights into median rent and the rent-to-value ratio to identify promising rental investment opportunities. The 1% rule suggests a property is viable if the monthly rent is at least 1% of its value. Note that using area medians may skew this figure, especially if low-end homes dominate the rental market. Despite this, the ratio is a useful initial indicator for further exploration of rental investments.
Median Monthly Rent | 2,344 |
---|---|
Median Home Value | 510,030 |
Rent to Value Ratio | 0.46% |
Disclaimer: Due to the dynamic nature of the housing market, the information in this report may not always reflect the most current or precise data. Maptimum is not responsible for any discrepancies or inaccuracies.