This is a sample Neighborhood Research Report. Sign up to create your personalized report for any address, neighborhood, ZIP code, or town in the US, free of charge.

This report was generated by Maptimum. Visit www.maptimum.com to create yours for any area in the U.S.

Neighborhood Report for Linwood Avenue

This comprehensive research report provides up-to-date and accurate data, along with AI-powered analysis, on the following area:

Address Surroundings Created on
0.75-mi Radius 09/02/2024

Executive Summary

Fun Facts

  • Historical Charm: Ardmore, PA, is known for its rich history, with many homes dating back to the early 20th century, giving the area a charming, historic feel.
  • Ardmore Music Hall: This local venue is a cultural hotspot, attracting big-name acts and providing a vibrant music scene for residents.
  • Suburban Square: One of the nation’s oldest shopping centers, Suburban Square offers a mix of high-end shops, dining options, and a farmers' market, making it a local favorite.

Suitability

  • Family-Friendly Environment: With 29% of households having children and excellent school districts (Lower Merion School District ranked in the 99th percentile), Ardmore is well-suited for families with young children.
  • Safety: The area boasts a low personal crime index of 22 (well below the national average of 100), making it a safe environment for your family.
  • Diverse and Liberal: While the area is predominantly Non-Hispanic White (70%), there is a notable presence of other ethnic groups, and the political climate is liberal, with 81% voting for Biden in 2020.
  • Serene and Natural: With 21% of the area covered in landscaped spaces like parks and residential gardens, Ardmore offers a serene environment.
  • Overall Conclusion: Ardmore is a highly suitable area for your family, offering safety, excellent schools, a liberal and somewhat diverse community, and a serene environment.

The Positive

  • High Educational Attainment: With 76% of residents holding a college or graduate degree, the area is intellectually stimulating and likely offers numerous educational resources.
  • Strong Property Value Growth: The 5-year home value appreciation forecast of 12.78% suggests a good investment opportunity.
  • Walkability: A Walk Score of 78 indicates that daily errands can be accomplished on foot, adding convenience to your lifestyle.

The Negative

  • High Flood Risk: The area has a high flood risk, which could impact property insurance rates and safety. Consider flood insurance and mitigation measures.
  • Older Housing Stock: With 86.20% of buildings constructed before 1980, homes may require more maintenance and updates.
  • Moderate Diversity: While there is some ethnic diversity, the area is still predominantly Non-Hispanic White (70%), which may not fully meet your preference for a diverse community.

Alternatives

  • Narberth, PA : Just a few miles away, Narberth offers a similarly charming, historic feel with excellent schools and a slightly higher diversity. However, it has a higher cost of living.
  • Haverford, PA : This area intersects with the Haverford Township School District, which is also highly ranked (96th percentile). It offers a more suburban feel with larger lots and more green space.
  • Bryn Mawr, PA : Known for its prestigious colleges and cultural amenities, Bryn Mawr offers excellent schools and a more diverse population. It also has a higher median home value, reflecting its desirability.

Desirability Score

Measures how closely a neighborhood matches an ideal location, ignoring cost. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better suitability for the typical homebuyer.

65/100

Bang for the Buck Score

Measures the quality of life relative to cost. Scores range from 0 to 100; a score above 50 indicates good value, while below 50 suggests the area may be overpriced.

67/100

The People

Population

Rising population growth often signals a vibrant, growing community, leading to increased housing demand and potential for value appreciation. However, it's a double-edged sword; rapid growth might stretch local infrastructure and resources, possibly impacting the area's quality of life.

Population 14,157
Population (5-Year Projection) 14,572
5-Year Growth Forecast 2.93%
Density (Person per Square Mile) 7,998
Density Level High

Household Composition

The makeup of households is a valuable insight for those seeking areas that resonate with family-oriented or child-friendly vibes.

Number of Households 6,141
Average Household Size 2.31
Household Makeup
Families with Kids 28.66%
Families without Kids 30.87%
Non-Families 40.47%

Age Groups

Age information is helpful for those aiming to align their living environment with their lifestyle preferences—whether you’re drawn to the energy and vibrancy of younger communities or the tranquility and maturity of areas with an older demographic.

Median Age 39.60
Age Groups
0-9 Years 11.34%
10-19 Years 11.75%
20-34 Years 19.83%
35-49 Years 21.73%
50-64 Years 17.16%
65+ Years 18.19%

Racial/Ethnic Composition

This breakdown helps pinpoint areas that align with your desire for cultural homogeneity or diversity.

Non-Hispanic White 70.02%
Hispanic 5.74%
Black/African American 11.30%
Asian 7.47%
Other 5.47%

The Economy

Education

Educational attainment percentages are for individuals aged 25 and older. Higher education levels in a community often correlate with increased civic engagement, safety, and prosperity.

Average Schooling Years 17.30
Educational Attainment Breakdown
Less than High School 1.72%
High School or Some College 22.52%
College Degree 35.95%
Graduate/Professional Degree 39.82%

Income Distribution

This section provides a detailed breakdown of household income levels in the area. Understanding a community's financial standing can reveal insights into its standard of living, economic diversity, and growth potential.

Median Household Income $123,000
On Food Stamps/SNAP 3.45%
Income Brackets
$0-$25K 8.96%
$25K-$50K 10.62%
$50K-$100K 18.12%
$100K-$200K 33.71%
$200K+ 28.59%

Housing

Occupancy Rates

Areas where most houses are owner-occupied (rather than rented) are more desirable because owners are more financially and emotionally invested in their properties and the community's well-being. High vacancy rates are a negative indicator, as they can signal that the area is in decline.

Total Housing Units 6,447
Occupancy
Owner Occupied 58.31%
Renter Occupied 36.95%
Vacant 4.75%

Age of Buildings

Reviewing the age of structures helps you understand the mix of modern and historic structures, anticipate the longevity of the infrastructure, and make informed investment decisions based on the area's growth and evolution.

Median Year Built 1946
Age Breakdown
New (Since 2020) 0.00%
Recent (2010-2019) 5.75%
Mid-Age (1980-2009) 8.05%
Old (Before 1980) 86.20%

Nearby Low-Income Housing

The availability of subsidized housing can influence neighborhood property values.

Main Types of Subsidized Housing:

  • Public Housing: Government-owned, managed by local authorities, offering affordable rents to low-income residents.
  • Project-Based Section 8: Private landlords provide reduced-rent apartments, subsidized by the government.
  • Low Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC): Incentivizes private developers with tax credits to create below-market rent properties for low-income tenants. LIHTC does not directly subsidize rents.

In the table below, Properties refer to distinct parcels of land or buildings designated as low-income housing. Units are the individual housing units (such as apartments) within those properties.

Total Properties 1
Closest Property (mi) 0.43
Total Units 63
Units per Square Mile 35.59
Property Types
Public Housing -
Section 8 1 (63 Units)
LIHTC -

Land Cover

Understanding a neighborhood's land cover helps you evaluate the aesthetic appeal, potential for recreational activities, and the balance of natural versus developed spaces.

Concise descriptions for each land cover category:

  • Landscaped Areas: Developed open spaces consisting mostly of vegetation, such as parks, golf courses, and residential gardens.
  • Residential Areas: Areas with a balanced mix of buildings and vegetation, such as single-family homes.
  • Urban & Commercial: Highly developed zones, including apartment complexes and commercial/industrial buildings.
  • Water Bodies: Open bodies of water like lakes, rivers, and ponds.
  • Wooded Areas: Forests dominated by tall trees, either deciduous, evergreen, or mixed.
  • Wild Vegetation: Areas with natural plant growth, including shrubs and herbaceous vegetation.
  • Farms & Gardens: Agricultural lands used for crops or livestock, such as fields of corn, soybeans, or pastures for grazing.
  • Marshes & Swamps: Wetlands either forested or grass-dominated.

Landscaped Areas 20.88%
Residential Areas 62.79%
Urban & Commercial 12.36%
Water Bodies 0.00%
Wooded Areas 3.91%
Wild Vegetation 0.00%
Farms & Gardens 0.04%
Marshes & Swamps 0.00%

Safety and Security

Crime Indexes

Crime Indexes compare local safety to a national average set at 100. For example, a crime index of 200 means the area has double the national average crime rate. Remember, the national average includes quieter rural areas, so urban centers may naturally show higher indexes.

  • Property crime involves private property, such as burglary and motor vehicle theft.
  • Personal crime is characterized as a violent crime that results in physical, emotional, or psychological harm to the victim, such as assault and battery.

Total Crime Index 82
Property Crime Index 93
Personal Crime Index 22

Fatal Car Accidents and DUIs

Government agencies release national fatal car accident data with a two-year delay. Extra caution is recommended in areas with higher accident frequencies.

You can see the exact location of fatal accidents on the map:

  • Non-DUI Accidents: Fatal accidents where the driver was not under the influence.
  • DUI Accidents: Fatal accidents where the driver was under the influence.

Data Period 2019-2022
All Fatal Accidents 1
Annual Fatal Accidents per Square Mile 0.14
Involving DUI 0.00%

Sex Offender Registry

This section provides detailed information from the Sex Offender Registry, including names, addresses, and specific convictions, to enhance your neighborhood safety awareness.

Total Sex Offenders 4
Sex Offenders per Square Mile 2.26
Closest Sex Offender (mi) 0.14
Conviction Type
Offense Against Children 3
Rape 0
Sexual Battery 1
Other Offense 0
# Photo Name and Address Distance Conviction
1 OWEN PEARSON MARSHALL
240 E SPRING AVE, ARDMORE, PA 19003
0.14 mi Offense Against Children
2 RICHARD JOSEPH QUINN-SIMONS
33 SOUTH CRICKET TERRACE, ARDMORE, PA 19003
0.31 mi Offense Against Children
3 MICHAEL DANIEL HALPERN
308 LOCUST AVE, ARDMORE, PA 19003
0.64 mi Sexual Battery
4 NATHAN CARL CONNORS
2319 HAVERFORD RD APT A, ARDMORE, PA 19003
0.66 mi Offense Against Children

Schools

Public School Districts

In many areas, students' options for attending public schools are determined by their residential address, linking them to specific school districts. Consequently, the quality of the schools within these districts plays a crucial role in shaping the educational outcomes of students. Additionally, high-performing school districts often indicate a strong community commitment to education, which can reflect positively on the neighborhood's overall desirability.

On the map, you will find the school districts that intersect with your selected area, along with detailed information about the nearby schools within each district.

Main District Lower Merion School District
Grade Range K-12
Number of Schools 11
Number of Students 8,523
Student/Teacher Ratio 11.17
State Rank 7 out of 606
State Rank Percentile 98.84%
Other Nearby Districts Haverford Township School District
Name Level District Distance (mi) Students State Rank Percentile Student/Teacher Ratio On Lunch Subsidy White Hispanic Black Asian
Chestnutwold Elementary School Elementary (K-5) Haverford Township School District 0.53 589 94.07% 14.90 16.13% 81.32% 2.89% 5.60% 2.38%
Lower Merion High School High (9-12) Lower Merion School District 0.86 1,712 99.11% 12.10 17.41% 63.79% 7.07% 11.97% 10.40%
Penn Wynne School Elementary (K-4) Lower Merion School District 1.25 615 97.46% 12.60 18.54% 54.47% 7.15% 12.52% 17.07%
Haverford Senior High School High (9-12) Haverford Township School District 1.35 2,005 90.36% 17.70 21.35% 80.15% 3.29% 5.74% 6.33%
Haverford Middle School Middle (6-8) Haverford Township School District 1.46 1,626 96.64% 14.30 20.36% 79.46% 3.44% 5.90% 5.35%
Chatham Park Elementary School Elementary (K-5) Haverford Township School District 1.83 608 96.61% 16.20 13.98% 78.78% 3.95% 4.11% 5.76%
Merion Elementary School Elementary (K-4) Lower Merion School District 1.88 446 98.89% 11.60 13.23% 64.35% 5.61% 4.71% 13.90%
Penn Valley School Elementary (K-4) Lower Merion School District 1.98 514 94.00% 11.30 16.54% 61.67% 10.31% 8.75% 6.42%
Coopertown Elementary School Elementary (K-5) Haverford Township School District 1.98 487 97.59% 12.30 10.06% 80.70% 3.70% 2.46% 5.13%
Lynnewood Elementary School Elementary (K-5) Haverford Township School District 2.09 588 84.35% 13.90 17.18% 79.76% 4.76% 3.40% 7.48%
Gladwyne School Elementary (K-4) Lower Merion School District 2.32 540 99.67% 12.30 8.70% 74.07% 5.56% 5.19% 5.56%

Charter, Magnet, and Private Schools

For families seeking alternatives to traditional public schools, several options are available:

  • Charter Schools: Publicly funded but independently run, charter schools offer innovative curriculums and may enroll students from any area.
  • Magnet Schools: Specializing in areas like science, the arts, or technology, magnet schools attract students from multiple districts with unique programs.
  • Private Schools: Privately funded, these schools are not bound by many of the public school regulations and often provide customized educational experiences with smaller class sizes.

The map displays nearby charter, magnet, and private schools (if any) along with key information about each.

Name Level Type Faith Affiliation Coed Distance (mi) Students State Rank Percentile Student/Teacher Ratio On Lunch Subsidy White Hispanic Black Asian
Cambridge School Private (PK-4) Private Nonsectarian Coed 0.30 52 - 32.00 - 46.15% 0.00% 3.85% 1.92%
Caskey Torah Academy Of Greater Philadelphia Private (PK-8) Private Jewish Coed 0.33 413 - 6.70 - 80.39% 0.48% 0.00% 0.00%
Regina Angelorum Academy Private (PK-8) Private Roman Catholic Coed 0.34 151 - 7.50 - 0.00% 76.16% 3.31% 0.66%
Fusion Academy - Ardmore Private (6-12) Private Nonsectarian Coed 0.45 59 - 2.30 - 83.05% 0.00% 11.86% 0.00%
Ancona Montessori School Private (PK-K) Private Nonsectarian Coed 0.77 50 - 2.50 - 10.00% 10.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Phebe Anna Thorne Kindergarten Private (PK-K) Private Nonsectarian Coed 0.81 69 - 6.10 - 14.49% 2.90% 1.45% 2.90%
Cardinal John Foley Regional Ca Private (PK-8) Private Roman Catholic Coed 0.96 424 - 10.40 - 70.52% 0.71% 1.65% 1.18%
The Haverford School Private (PK-12) Private Nonsectarian Boys 1.09 - - - - - - - -
Friends School Haverford Private (PK-5) Private Friends Coed 1.19 88 - 4.50 - 25.00% 0.00% 10.23% 3.41%
Main Line Reform Temple School For Early Childhood Private (PK-K) Private Jewish Coed 1.20 130 - 8.00 - 12.31% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Temple Beth Hillel-Beth El Early Childhood Center Private (K) Private Jewish Coed 1.28 15 - 15.00 - 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Child Steps Private (PK-K) Private Nonsectarian Coed 1.36 152 - 6.00 - 6.58% 0.00% 1.32% 0.00%
St Katherine School Private (K-10) Private Roman Catholic Coed 1.52 69 - 5.30 - 21.74% 7.25% 55.07% 0.00%
The Gateway School Private (PK-K) Private Nonsectarian Coed 1.54 80 - 8.30 - 21.25% 0.00% 1.25% 2.50%
St Faith Preschool & Kindergarten Private (PK-K) Private Nonsectarian Coed 1.58 98 - 16.00 - 14.29% 1.02% 1.02% 0.00%
St Margaret School Private (PK-8) Private Roman Catholic Coed 1.71 269 - 14.00 - 62.83% 2.97% 13.38% 3.35%
Perelman Jewish Day School-Stern Center Private (PK-5) Private Jewish Coed 1.82 245 - 217.00 - 86.94% 0.82% 0.82% 0.00%
The Baldwin School Private (PK-12) Private Nonsectarian Girls 1.81 567 - 7.20 - 61.02% 2.65% 10.23% 14.99%
Robert J Wilf Preschool And Kindergarten Private (PK-K) Private Jewish Coed 1.83 166 - 5.60 - 9.64% 0.00% 0.00% 0.60%
Lindamood-Bell Learning Processes Bryn Mawr Private (6-12) Private Nonsectarian Coed 1.85 8 - 1.40 - 75.00% 0.00% 12.50% 12.50%
Friends Central School Private (PK-12) Private Friends Coed 1.94 774 - 8.00 - 56.98% 4.78% 16.15% 7.24%
The Shipley School Private (PK-12) Private Nonsectarian Coed 1.94 780 - 7.30 - 78.97% 2.44% 7.44% 4.62%
Gan Chabad Of The Main Line Private (PK-K) Private Jewish Coed 2.10 79 - 1.80 - 13.92% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Jack M Barrack Hebrew Academy Private (6-12) Private Jewish Coed 2.15 312 - 5.20 - 78.53% 4.81% 0.64% 0.96%
Manoa Community Church-Keep Private (PK-K) Private Presbyterian Coed 2.26 - - - - - - - -
Overbrook Preschool And Kindergarten Private (PK-K) Private Nonsectarian Coed 2.27 66 - 13.00 - 7.58% 0.00% 6.06% 1.52%
Merion Mercy Academy Private (9-12) Private Roman Catholic Girls 2.29 - - - - - - - -
Keep At Manoa Community Church Private (PK-K) Private Presbyterian Coed 2.29 - - - - - - - -
Sacred Heart Catholic School Private (1) Private Roman Catholic Coed 2.31 21 - 1.40 - 76.19% 9.52% 4.76% 0.00%
Waldron Mercy Academy Private (PK-8) Private Roman Catholic Coed 2.33 416 - 9.60 - 58.89% 0.00% 17.79% 1.44%
9107 Little Friends Academy Inc Private (PK-K) Private Nonsectarian Coed 2.32 15 - 5.00 - 13.33% 0.00% 20.00% 0.00%
Sts Colman-John Neumann Private (PK-8) Private Roman Catholic Coed 2.43 352 - 16.00 - 77.84% 2.56% 0.28% 1.99%
The Gladwyne Montessori School Private (PK-6) Private Nonsectarian Coed 2.42 124 - 7.60 - 0.00% 1.61% 68.55% 0.00%
Talmudical Yeshiva Of Philadelphia Private (9-12) Private Jewish Boys 2.49 107 - 15.00 - 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Hyman Korman High School-Talmudical Yeshiva Of Phi Private (9-12) Private Jewish Boys 2.49 105 - 16.10 - 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Phila Yeshiva Private (9-12) Private Jewish Boys 2.49 105 - 14.70 - 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Ijoba Shule Private (PK-11) Private Other Coed 2.55 13 - 3.00 - 7.69% 0.00% 84.62% 0.00%

Environmental Health

Drinking Water Quality

Clean drinking water is essential for good health. Under the Safe Drinking Water Act, water systems are required to meet strict safety regulations. Maptimum’s Water Health Score assesses water systems based on the following key factors:

  • Population Served: Larger systems often have more resources and improved efficiency.
  • Source: Groundwater (such as wells) is typically safer than surface water (like rivers) because it is naturally filtered through soil and rock, reducing the risk of contamination.
  • Lead and Copper Levels: Lead and copper can enter drinking water from the corrosion of older pipes and plumbing. The 90th percentile of samples must meet EPA limits—0.015 mg/L for lead and 1.3 mg/L for copper.
  • Health-Based Violations: These occur when contaminant levels (like Lead or Chlorine) exceed safe standards, or when treatment processes fail.
  • Monitoring and Reporting Violations: Major violations where systems fail to properly monitor or report water quality.
  • Unresolved Violations: Health-based or major violations that have not been resolved according to the latest reports.

Remember, water systems often cover entire cities or regions, so moving within the same area may not significantly change your water quality.

Water System AQUA PA MAIN SYSTEM
Water Health Score 3.85 / 5 Moderate
Population Served 822,600
Primary Source Surface water
Lead and Copper (Latest Sampling)
Lead (Pb) 0.0034 mg/L Safe
Copper (Cu) No Data
Serious Violations (Last 5 Years)
Health Based 0
Monitoring/Reporting 68
Not Yet Resolved 0

Air Quality

Air quality directly impacts health, with pollution linked to multiple health concerns. Air quality can vary within a day and seasonally. Our analysis uses hourly data from the past 365 days, highlighting the percentage of time the Air Quality Index (AQI) and specific pollutants were in the dangerous range.

Poor or Very Poor Air Quality 4.78%
Worst Month June
Major Pollutant O3
Pollutants
Bad or Very Bad SO2 0.00%
Bad or Very Bad NO2 0.02%
Bad or Very Bad PM10 0.00%
Bad or Very Bad PM2.5 0.55%
Bad or Very Bad O3 1.92%
Bad or Very Bad CO 0.00%

Hazardous Waste Sites

Hazardous waste sites near your home can pollute air, soil, and water, posing health risks like respiratory issues, contaminated drinking water, and long-term exposure to hazardous chemicals. Even compliant facilities, when densely clustered, can create cumulative environmental impacts that affect quality of life and property values.

We consider a facility high-risk based on a combination of the following criteria:

  • Active: Facilities with ongoing operations have a higher likelihood of environmental contamination.
  • Transport: Involvement in waste transport raises the risk of accidents or spills.
  • High Output: Large Quantity Generators (LQG) produce significant amounts of waste, posing greater risks.
  • TSDFs: Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities (TSDFs) handle hazardous waste, with a high potential for leaks and spills.
  • History of Violations: Past violations of EPA or state regulations indicate a higher risk of non-compliance and incidents.

All Sites 35
High-Risk Sites 1
High-Risk Sites per Square Mile 0.56
Closest High-Risk Site (mi) 0.42
Facility Types
Active 21
Transport 0
Large Quantity Generator 1
TSDFs 0
With Recent Violations 0

Noise Pollution

A Soundscore™ rating, ranging from 50 (indicating high noise levels) to 100 (signifying low noise levels), measures the environmental noise of a location, providing a quantifiable insight into the auditory environment you can expect.

Sound Score 79 (Active)
Sources of Noise
Airports Calm
Vehicular Traffic Active
Local Commercial and Community Active

Natural Risks

Earthquake Risk

This section utilizes Peak Ground Acceleration (PGA) data from the US Geological Survey (USGS) to forecast the maximum potential earthquake intensity and damage with a 2% probability of being exceeded in the area over the next 50 years, providing valuable insights into seismic risks.

PGA 0.13
Earthquake Risk Low

Flood Risk

The flood risk data, sourced from FEMA, assess the likelihood and potential impacts of flooding by considering various factors including flood frequency, proximity to water bodies, and property characteristics like elevation and rebuilding costs.

On the map, areas are designated as high risk or moderate risk:

  • High Risk: Classified as Special Flood Hazard Areas (SFHA), these regions face a 1% annual chance of flooding (equivalent to a 26% chance over a 30-year period, or a 100-year flood risk). In these areas, purchasing flood insurance is mandatory.
  • Moderate Risk: These zones have a 0.2% annual chance of flooding (equivalent to a 6% chance within a 30-year timeframe, or a 500-year flood risk). Flood insurance is recommended here. Such areas may transition to high-risk in the future due to factors like urban development or environmental changes.

Has High-Risk Zones Yes (Type: A, AE)
Closest High-Risk Zone (mi) 0.43
Has Moderate-Risk Zones Yes (Type: X)

Lifestyle

Walkability and Bikeability

The Walk Score, ranging from 0 to 100, gauges an address's accessibility on foot—the higher the score, the easier it is to accomplish daily errands without a car.

Similarly, the Bike Score evaluates an area's suitability for cycling based on infrastructure, topography, proximity to key destinations, road connectivity, and the cycling community's presence.

Walk Score® 78 (Very Walkable)
Bike Score® 50 (Bikeable)

Dating and Marriage Outlook

Gain insights into the area's potential for connections, dating, and finding life partners. This section explores the social landscape, highlighting marital status for residents 15 years and older and detailing the female-to-male ratio for those aged 20 to 44. A ratio above 1 indicates more women than men, suggesting enhanced dating prospects for men, and vice versa.

Marrital Status
Single, Never Married 28.21%
Married 57.41%
Other 14.37%
Female to Male Ratio 1.05

Pet Friendliness

Pets, especially dogs, provide a great way for locals to interact and build connections. If you have pets, you'll likely enjoy living in an area with a high percentage of fellow pet owners.

Has Any Pet 45.71%
Has Dog(s) 31.53%
Has Cat(s) 20.11%

Politics and Social Climate

Voting Patterns

Living in a community that shares your values can be important. Our detailed analysis of Presidential Election results at the precinct level—the most granular unit for voting data—allows you to understand the political tendencies of the area.

On the map, the precicits that intersect with your selected area, along with their vote count in the 2020 election, are presented:

  • Solid Democratic: Precincts where the Democratic margin (percentage voting for the Democratic candidate minus the percentage voting for the Republican candidate) exceeds 15%.
  • Leaning Democratic: Precincts where the Democratic margin is between 5% and 15%.
  • Balanced: Precincts where the democrat margin is between -5% and 5%.
  • Leaning Republican: Precincts where the Republican margin is between 5% and 15%.
  • Solid Republican: Precincts where the Republican margin exceeds 15%.

2020 Presidential Election Results
Joe Biden 80.66%
Donald Trump 18.55%

Ideological Leanings

Gain deeper insights into the social fabric of the neighborhood with data on self-reported ideological leanings, sourced from MRI-Simmons surveys.

Very Liberal 27.81%
Somewhat Liberal 36.50%
Somewhat Conservative 23.02%
Very Conservative 12.67%

Investment Insights

Value Appreciation Forecast

Our forecast uses the latest area-specific trends and market activities to offer a strategic overview of expected growth across the overall area, rather than for individual homes.

Median Home Value 521,027
5-Year Forecast Median Home Value 587,639
5-Year Appreciation Forecast 12.78%

Rental Viability Analysis

Gain insights into median rent and the rent-to-value ratio to identify promising rental investment opportunities. The 1% rule suggests a property is viable if the monthly rent is at least 1% of its value. Note that using area medians may skew this figure, especially if low-end homes dominate the rental market. Despite this, the ratio is a useful initial indicator for further exploration of rental investments.

Median Monthly Rent 1,993
Median Home Value 521,027
Rent to Value Ratio 0.38%
Leave us a review on Google
Did you find this report useful? Please take a moment to rate us on Google. We appreciate your feedback.

Disclaimer: Due to the dynamic nature of the housing market, the information in this report may not always reflect the most current or precise data. Maptimum is not responsible for any discrepancies or inaccuracies.