This is a sample Neighborhood Research Report. Sign up to create your personalized report for any address, neighborhood, ZIP code, or town in the US, free of charge.

This report was generated by Maptimum. Visit www.maptimum.com to create yours for any area in the U.S.

Neighborhood Report for Elmira Road

This comprehensive research report provides up-to-date and accurate data, along with AI-powered analysis, on the following area:

Address Surroundings Created on
1.00-mi Radius 10/12/2024

Executive Summary

Fun Facts

  • Historic Roots: The MLK neighborhood is named after Martin Luther King Jr., reflecting its rich history and cultural significance in the civil rights movement.
  • Diverse Architecture: The area features a mix of architectural styles, from charming mid-century homes to modern new builds, showcasing the neighborhood's evolution over time.
  • Community Events: The neighborhood hosts the annual East Austin Studio Tour, a popular event that celebrates local artists and fosters community engagement.

Suitability

  • Cultural Diversity: With a racial and ethnic composition of 35% Non-Hispanic White, 31% Hispanic, and 25% Black/African American, the area aligns well with your preference for a diverse community.
  • Family Presence: Although only 23% of households have children, the presence of families indicates a community where your family could find peers and playmates.
  • Safety Concerns: The high personal crime index of 205 and the presence of 54 registered sex offenders may be concerning for a family with young children.
  • Educational Opportunities: The Austin Independent School District ranks in the 43rd percentile, which may not meet your expectations for high-quality education.
  • Overall Conclusion: While the neighborhood offers cultural diversity and urban vibrancy, safety and school quality may require further consideration before committing long-term.

The Positive

  • Urban Vibe: The area’s bustling urban environment, with 42% residential and 6% urban/commercial land cover, provides the lively atmosphere you desire.
  • Strong Economic Indicators: A low unemployment rate of 3.45% and a median household income of $83,505 suggest a stable economic environment.
  • Political Alignment: With 89% of votes cast for Biden in 2020, the neighborhood aligns with your liberal political preference.

The Negative

  • Safety Risks: The property crime index of 160 and personal crime index of 205 are significantly above the national average, indicating a need for vigilance and possibly enhanced security measures.
  • Flood Risk: The area has a high flood risk, which could impact property insurance costs and require flood-proofing measures for homes.
  • Limited Transit Options: A transit score of 45 suggests limited public transportation options, which may necessitate reliance on personal vehicles for commuting.

Alternatives

  • Hyde Park : Known for its historic charm and strong community feel, Hyde Park offers better school ratings and a lower crime rate, though it may come with a higher price tag.
  • Mueller : This master-planned community offers excellent amenities, including parks and a town center, with a strong focus on sustainability and family-friendly activities.
  • South Lamar : Offers a vibrant cultural scene with numerous dining and entertainment options, along with a more favorable crime rate and school performance compared to MLK.

Desirability Score

Measures how closely a neighborhood matches an ideal location, ignoring cost. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better suitability for the typical homebuyer.

46/100

Bang for the Buck Score

Measures the quality of life relative to cost. Scores range from 0 to 100; a score above 50 indicates good value, while below 50 suggests the area may be overpriced.

34/100

The People

Population

Rising population growth often signals a vibrant, growing community, leading to increased housing demand and potential for value appreciation. However, it's a double-edged sword; rapid growth might stretch local infrastructure and resources, possibly impacting the area's quality of life.

Population 12,625
Population (5-Year Projection) 14,791
5-Year Growth Forecast 17.16%
Density (Person per Square Mile) 4,021
Density Level Medium High

Household Composition

The makeup of households is a valuable insight for those seeking areas that resonate with family-oriented or child-friendly vibes.

Number of Households 5,438
Average Household Size 2.32
Household Makeup
Families with Kids 23.00%
Families without Kids 23.32%
Non-Families 53.68%

Age Groups

Age information is helpful for those aiming to align their living environment with their lifestyle preferences—whether you’re drawn to the energy and vibrancy of younger communities or the tranquility and maturity of areas with an older demographic.

Median Age 35.10
Age Groups
0-9 Years 11.64%
10-19 Years 8.80%
20-34 Years 29.39%
35-49 Years 25.75%
50-64 Years 12.81%
65+ Years 11.60%

Racial/Ethnic Composition

This breakdown helps pinpoint areas that align with your desire for cultural homogeneity or diversity.

Non-Hispanic White 35.21%
Hispanic 31.04%
Black/African American 25.18%
Asian 4.06%
Other 4.51%

The Economy

Education

Educational attainment percentages are for individuals aged 25 and older. Higher education levels in a community often correlate with increased civic engagement, safety, and prosperity.

Average Schooling Years 15.75
Educational Attainment Breakdown
Less than High School 8.67%
High School or Some College 35.30%
College Degree 35.92%
Graduate/Professional Degree 20.11%

Income Distribution

This section provides a detailed breakdown of household income levels in the area. Understanding a community's financial standing can reveal insights into its standard of living, economic diversity, and growth potential.

Median Household Income $83,500
On Food Stamps/SNAP 11.35%
Income Brackets
$0-$25K 16.62%
$25K-$50K 13.06%
$50K-$100K 27.01%
$100K-$200K 25.52%
$200K+ 17.76%

Labor Market

Labor force participation is the percentage of the 16+ population working or actively seeking work. A higher rate shows greater economic engagement.

People not in the labor force are those neither working nor seeking work, like retirees, students, or discouraged workers.

The unemployment rate is the percentage of the labor force without jobs. A lower rate signals a stronger job market with more opportunities.

Labor Force Participation Rate 72.15%
Unemployment Rate 3.45%

Housing

Occupancy Rates

Areas where most houses are owner-occupied (rather than rented) are more desirable because owners are more financially and emotionally invested in their properties and the community's well-being. High vacancy rates are a negative indicator, as they can signal that the area is in decline.

Total Housing Units 5,968
Occupancy
Owner Occupied 53.69%
Renter Occupied 37.43%
Vacant 8.88%

Age of Buildings

Reviewing the age of structures helps you understand the mix of modern and historic structures, anticipate the longevity of the infrastructure, and make informed investment decisions based on the area's growth and evolution.

Median Year Built 1991
Age Breakdown
New (Since 2020) 1.12%
Recent (2010-2019) 25.37%
Mid-Age (1980-2009) 22.67%
Old (Before 1980) 50.84%

Nearby Low-Income Housing

The availability of subsidized housing can influence neighborhood property values.

Main Types of Subsidized Housing:

  • Public Housing: Government-owned, managed by local authorities, offering affordable rents to low-income residents.
  • Project-Based Section 8: Private landlords provide reduced-rent apartments, subsidized by the government.
  • Low Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC): Incentivizes private developers with tax credits to create below-market rent properties for low-income tenants. LIHTC does not directly subsidize rents.

In the table below, Properties refer to distinct parcels of land or buildings designated as low-income housing. Units are the individual housing units (such as apartments) within those properties.

Total Properties 11
Closest Property (mi) 0.26
Total Units 570
Units per Square Mile 181.53
Property Types
Public Housing -
Section 8 1 (97 Units)
LIHTC 10 (473 Units)

Land Cover

Understanding a neighborhood's land cover helps you evaluate the aesthetic appeal, potential for recreational activities, and the balance of natural versus developed spaces.

Concise descriptions for each land cover category:

  • Landscaped Areas: Developed open spaces consisting mostly of vegetation, such as parks, golf courses, and residential gardens.
  • Residential Areas: Areas with a balanced mix of buildings and vegetation, such as single-family homes.
  • Urban & Commercial: Highly developed zones, including apartment complexes and commercial/industrial buildings.
  • Water Bodies: Open bodies of water like lakes, rivers, and ponds.
  • Wooded Areas: Forests dominated by tall trees, either deciduous, evergreen, or mixed.
  • Wild Vegetation: Areas with natural plant growth, including shrubs and herbaceous vegetation.
  • Farms & Gardens: Agricultural lands used for crops or livestock, such as fields of corn, soybeans, or pastures for grazing.
  • Marshes & Swamps: Wetlands either forested or grass-dominated.

Landscaped Areas 33.18%
Residential Areas 41.69%
Urban & Commercial 6.39%
Water Bodies 0.00%
Wooded Areas 14.25%
Wild Vegetation 2.33%
Farms & Gardens 0.16%
Marshes & Swamps 1.87%

Safety and Security

Crime Indexes

Crime Indexes compare local safety to a national average set at 100. For example, a crime index of 200 means the area has double the national average crime rate. Remember, the national average includes quieter rural areas, so urban centers may naturally show higher indexes.

  • Property crime involves private property, such as burglary and motor vehicle theft.
  • Personal crime is characterized as a violent crime that results in physical, emotional, or psychological harm to the victim, such as assault and battery.

Total Crime Index 167
Property Crime Index 160
Personal Crime Index 205

Fatal Car Accidents and DUIs

Government agencies release national fatal car accident data with a two-year delay. Extra caution is recommended in areas with higher accident frequencies.

You can see the exact location of fatal accidents on the map:

  • Non-DUI Accidents: Fatal accidents where the driver was not under the influence.
  • DUI Accidents: Fatal accidents where the driver was under the influence.

Data Period 2019-2022
All Fatal Accidents 4
Annual Fatal Accidents per Square Mile 0.32
Involving DUI 0.00%

Sex Offender Registry

This section provides detailed information from the Sex Offender Registry, including names, addresses, and specific convictions, to enhance your neighborhood safety awareness.

Total Sex Offenders 54
Sex Offenders per Square Mile 17.20
Closest Sex Offender (mi) 0.06
Conviction Type
Offense Against Children 42
Rape 0
Sexual Battery 10
Other Offense 2
# Photo Name and Address Distance Conviction
1 WILLIAM ANTHONY YANTIS
1618 ELMIRA RD, AUSTIN, TX 78721
0.06 mi Offense Against Children
2 ALEXANDER MOSELY
4510 KITTY AVE, AUSTIN, TX 78721
0.09 mi Offense Against Children
3 JOE ALFREDO LIENDO
4510 KITTY AVE, AUSTIN, TX 78721
0.09 mi Offense Against Children
4 ALFIE ALFONSO LEWIS
4611 BANDERA RD, AUSTIN, TX 78721
0.16 mi Sexual Battery
5 CHARLES RAMOND BROWN
1404 SPRINGDALE RD, AUSTIN, TX 78721
0.23 mi Sexual Battery
6 SHANE BIERWIRTH
1705 JJ SEABROOK DR, AUSTIN, TX 78721
0.30 mi Offense Against Children
7 IVAN ALVARADO
1705 J J SEABROOK DR, AUSTIN, TX 78721
0.30 mi Offense Against Children
8 HOWARD ANTHONY
1705 J J SEABROOK DR, AUSTIN, TX 78721
0.30 mi Offense Against Children
9 LEIGH CLAIBORNE MAHAFFEY
1705 J J SEABROOK DR, AUSTIN, TX 78721
0.30 mi Offense Against Children
10 RONNIE JOE WILLIAMS
1705 J J SEABROOK DR, AUSTIN, TX 78721
0.30 mi Offense Against Children
11 ROBERT LEE MOONE
1705 J J SEABROOK DR, AUSTIN, TX 78721
0.30 mi Offense Against Children
12 DAVID LEE LEYENDECKER
1705 J J SEABROOK DR, AUSTIN, TX 78721
0.30 mi Offense Against Children
13 JASON G SAUNAR
1705 J J SEABROOK DR, AUSTIN, TX 78721
0.30 mi Offense Against Children
14 SAMUEL III WILLIFORD
1705 J J SEABROOK DR, AUSTIN, TX 78721
0.30 mi Sexual Battery
15 EDWARD LELEAND HERRING
1705 J J SEABROOK DR, AUSTIN, TX 78721
0.30 mi Offense Against Children
16 FREDRICK RAMOS
1705 J J SEABROOK DR APT #0, AUSTIN, TX 78721
0.30 mi Offense Against Children
17 TIMOTHY SCOTT
1705 J J SEABROOK DR, AUSTIN, TX 78721
0.30 mi Offense Against Children
18 BRANDON CORDERO SANTILLAN
1702 J J SEABROOK DR, AUSTIN, TX 78721
0.32 mi Offense Against Children
19 RYAN CARDWELL KELLEY
1702 J J SEABROOK DR, AUSTIN, TX 78721
0.32 mi Offense Against Children
20 SEAN KEALY COURTNEY
1702 J J SEABROOK DR, AUSTIN, TX 78721
0.32 mi Offense Against Children
21 STEPHEN N ALEXANDER
1702 J J SEABROOK DR, AUSTIN, TX 78721
0.32 mi Offense Against Children
22 ALBERT LEBSCH
1702 SEABROOK, AUSTIN, TX 78721
0.32 mi Offense Against Children
23 PAUL DAVID COCHRAN
1702 J J SEABROOK DR, AUSTIN, TX 78721
0.32 mi Offense Against Children
24 CHRISTOPHER MENDEZ
1702 J J SEABROOK DR, AUSTIN, TX 78721
0.32 mi Offense Against Children
25 BOBBY RAY AYALA
1702 J J SEABROOK DR, AUSTIN, TX 78721
0.32 mi Other Offense
26 CORTEZ WILLIAMS
1702 J J SEABROOK DR, AUSTIN, TX 78721
0.32 mi Offense Against Children
27 JESSE ALBERT MASSENGALE
1702 J J SEABROOK DR, AUSTIN, TX 78721
0.32 mi Offense Against Children
28 JOHNNY GARCIA THOMLIN
1702 J J SEABROOK DR, AUSTIN, TX 78721
0.32 mi Offense Against Children
29 JOSHUA MARTIN
4305 SCOTTSDALE RD, AUSTIN, TX 78721
0.36 mi Sexual Battery
30 KRISTOPHER ALLEN DENNISON
3501 TOUCHSTONE ST, AUSTIN, TX 78723
0.40 mi Sexual Battery
31 HARRY COLLIER WASHINGTON
1430 WEBBERVILLE RD, AUSTIN, TX 78721
0.42 mi Offense Against Children
32 ABRAHAM HERNANDEZ
1618 WEBBERVILLE ROAD UNIT A, AUSTIN, TX 78721
0.47 mi Sexual Battery
33 JEFFERY HOCKETT
1161 EASTFIELD AVE APT #E, AUSTIN, TX 78721
0.49 mi Offense Against Children
34 CARLOS ESCOBAR
1808 WEBBERVILLE RD, AUSTIN, TX 78721
0.51 mi Offense Against Children
35 NOELL JAMES KNOWLEN
1808 WEBBERVILLE RD, AUSTIN, TX 78721
0.51 mi Offense Against Children
36 RAYMOND ODELL SMITH
3800 E 16TH ST, AUSTIN, TX 78721
0.52 mi Offense Against Children
37 BREON JC JOINER
4702 CARSONHILL DR, AUSTIN, TX 78723
0.57 mi Offense Against Children
38 MARCUS N FORD
4601 BROADHILL DR, AUSTIN, TX 78723
0.59 mi Offense Against Children
39 ERIC TAYLOR EDWARDS
4812 WALDEN CIR, AUSTIN, TX 78723
0.62 mi Offense Against Children
40 KENNETH ALLEN SMITH
1408 E M. FRANKLIN AVE, AUSTIN, TX 78721
0.66 mi Offense Against Children
41 MICHAEL GREEN
1408 E M. FRANKLIN AVE, AUSTIN, TX 78721
0.66 mi Offense Against Children
42 KENNETH LAWRENCE CLARK
4902 SINGLESHOT CIRCLE, AUSTIN, TX 78723
0.71 mi Sexual Battery
43 EDWARD LEE CAROTHERS
1403 GREENWOOD AVE, AUSTIN, TX 78721
0.74 mi Sexual Battery
44 PEDRO ESCALANTE
5101 STAR LIGHT TERRACE, AUSTIN, TX 78721
0.74 mi Offense Against Children
45 GREGORY STEEN
1950 WEBBERVILLE RD APT #2115, AUSTIN, TX 78721
0.77 mi Other Offense
46 STEVEN WAYNE JOHNSON
4913 CARSONHILL DR, AUSTIN, TX 78723
0.83 mi Offense Against Children
47 ALEXANDER JOHNSON
4913 CARSONHILL DR, AUSTIN, TX 78723
0.83 mi Offense Against Children
48 TRACY HOLLOMAN
5000 LEDESMA RD, AUSTIN, TX 78721
0.84 mi Sexual Battery
49 NELSON R CHOYCE
1137 ELEANOR STREET, AUSTIN, TX 78721
0.87 mi Offense Against Children
50 IAN T GAMMILL
3037 PECAN SPRINGS RD, AUSTIN, TX 78723
0.90 mi Sexual Battery
51 JONATHAN JOHNSON
5800 TECHNI CENTER DR APT #330, AUSTIN, TX 78721
0.90 mi Offense Against Children
52 JAMES FREDERICK CALAHAN
5223 BASSWOOD LN, AUSTIN, TX 78723
0.91 mi Offense Against Children
53 JAMES DAVID SMITH
5221 MARYMOUNT DR, AUSTIN, TX 78723
0.92 mi Offense Against Children
54 CHRISTOPHER LEE POWELL
5201 MARYMOUNT DR, AUSTIN, TX 78723
0.93 mi Offense Against Children

Schools

Public School Districts

In many areas, students' options for attending public schools are determined by their residential address, linking them to specific school districts. Consequently, the quality of the schools within these districts plays a crucial role in shaping the educational outcomes of students. Additionally, high-performing school districts often indicate a strong community commitment to education, which can reflect positively on the neighborhood's overall desirability.

On the map, you will find the school districts that intersect with your selected area, along with detailed information about the nearby schools within each district.

Main District Austin ISD
Grade Range PK-12
Number of Schools 119
Number of Students 73,384
Student/Teacher Ratio 16.55
State Rank 554 out of 968
State Rank Percentile 42.77%
Other Nearby Districts -
Name Level District Distance (mi) Students State Rank Percentile Student/Teacher Ratio On Lunch Subsidy White Hispanic Black Asian
Norman-Sims Elementary Elementary (PK-5) Austin ISD 0.85 278 4.11% 19.80 95.68% 2.16% 50.72% 41.01% 4.32%
General Marshall Middle Middle (6) Austin ISD 0.97 0 - - - - - - -
Ortega Elementary Elementary (PK-6) Austin ISD 1.00 274 25.09% 15.30 90.15% 5.47% 78.10% 13.87% 1.46%
Pecan Springs Elementary Elementary (PK-5) Austin ISD 1.40 292 1.37% 16.20 96.58% 5.48% 63.70% 26.71% 1.03%
Oak Springs Elementary Elementary (PK-5) Austin ISD 1.45 233 0.94% 22.50 96.57% 3.43% 60.09% 34.76% 0.43%
Blanton Elementary Elementary (PK-5) Austin ISD 1.60 620 73.88% 15.70 41.61% 41.13% 42.10% 7.42% 2.58%
Govalle Elementary Elementary (PK-6) Austin ISD 1.64 360 2.78% 13.70 85.28% 2.78% 80.56% 15.83% 0.28%
Campbell Elementary Elementary (PK-5) Austin ISD 1.70 185 19.72% 15.40 71.35% 21.08% 27.57% 40.00% 6.49%
Eastside Early College High School High (9-12) Austin ISD 1.71 699 9.01% 19.90 80.97% 2.43% 80.54% 15.45% 0.86%
Maplewood Elementary Elementary (PK-5) Austin ISD 1.85 402 85.88% 14.30 28.86% 50.00% 31.59% 7.46% 2.24%
Lasa High School High (9-12) Austin ISD 1.90 1,432 99.70% 17.80 13.62% 43.09% 21.79% 2.65% 24.37%
Sadler Means Ywla Middle (6-8) Austin ISD 2.03 322 4.74% 17.90 86.02% 4.66% 74.53% 16.15% 2.80%
Alternative Learning Center High (6-12) Austin ISD 2.09 114 - 11.40 78.07% 11.40% 68.42% 17.54% 0.00%
Harris Elementary Elementary (PK-5) Austin ISD 2.12 373 7.27% 14.30 89.81% 3.75% 80.16% 13.14% 1.07%
Garza Independence High School High (10-12) Austin ISD 2.19 150 - 5.70 45.33% 39.33% 44.00% 8.67% 3.33%
Andrews Elementary Elementary (PK-5) Austin ISD 2.32 343 9.11% 18.00 96.21% 5.83% 78.72% 5.83% 9.04%
Kealing Middle Middle (6-8) Austin ISD 2.35 1,255 93.73% 18.10 29.56% 37.85% 29.48% 10.28% 15.30%
Winn Montessori Elementary (PK-5) Austin ISD 2.35 267 23.98% 16.00 66.29% 12.73% 59.18% 20.60% 2.62%
Blackshear Elementary Elementary (PK-5) Austin ISD 2.50 262 25.82% 13.70 54.20% 24.05% 42.75% 22.90% 1.15%
Jordan Elementary Elementary (PK-5) Austin ISD 2.57 555 0.58% 15.10 93.15% 3.60% 66.85% 23.96% 3.78%
Lee Elementary Elementary (K-6) Austin ISD 2.58 458 87.17% 14.50 21.62% 65.50% 18.34% 2.40% 7.42%
Lbj Echs High (9-12) Austin ISD 2.62 772 11.22% 15.60 79.40% 1.42% 65.41% 30.44% 1.17%
Ridgetop Elementary Elementary (PK-5) Austin ISD 2.63 367 90.29% 15.20 19.07% 40.05% 47.68% 2.18% 3.00%
Northeast Early College High School High (9-12) Austin ISD 2.76 1,019 7.95% 16.70 92.54% 3.53% 83.81% 10.30% 1.47%
Zavala Elementary Elementary (PK-6) Austin ISD 2.76 259 7.74% 11.90 86.87% 7.72% 68.73% 20.46% 0.77%

Charter, Magnet, and Private Schools

For families seeking alternatives to traditional public schools, several options are available:

  • Charter Schools: Publicly funded but independently run, charter schools offer innovative curriculums and may enroll students from any area.
  • Magnet Schools: Specializing in areas like science, the arts, or technology, magnet schools attract students from multiple districts with unique programs.
  • Private Schools: Privately funded, these schools are not bound by many of the public school regulations and often provide customized educational experiences with smaller class sizes.

The map displays nearby charter, magnet, and private schools (if any) along with key information about each.

Name Level Type Faith Affiliation Coed Distance (mi) Students State Rank Percentile Student/Teacher Ratio On Lunch Subsidy White Hispanic Black Asian
Los Amiguitos Private (PK-2) Private Nonsectarian Coed 0.57 19 - 5.00 - 21.05% 5.26% 0.00% 5.26%
Idea Health Professions Academy Elementary (K-5) Charter - - 1.00 286 6.33% 15.00 88.46% 7.34% 70.98% 20.28% 0.70%
Idea Health Professions College Preparatory Middle (6-10) Charter - - 1.00 264 73.36% 11.50 89.02% 7.95% 75.38% 14.39% 0.38%
Austin Peace Academy Private (PK-12) Private Islamic Coed 1.02 605 - 6.90 - 32.56% 3.97% 3.97% 55.37%
The East Austin College Prep At Southwest Key Elementary (PK-6) Charter - - 1.13 161 2.31% 16.80 98.14% 0.62% 89.44% 8.70% 0.00%
The East Austin College Prep At Mlk High (7-12) Charter - - 1.14 226 20.13% 13.30 98.23% 2.21% 88.94% 7.96% 0.00%
Acton Academy Private (1-12) Private Nonsectarian Coed 1.46 - - - - - - - -
Austin Achieve Middle Middle (5-8) Charter - - 1.61 625 13.51% 15.30 95.36% 1.60% 92.48% 5.76% 0.00%
Texans Can Academy - Austin High (9-12) Charter - - 1.64 265 3.12% 18.60 85.66% 3.77% 81.89% 12.45% 0.75%
Austin Independent School District (Isd) Prek Partnership (Pkp) Prekindergarten (PK) Charter - - 2.08 92 - - 88.04% 17.39% 59.78% 18.48% 1.09%
Texas Empowerment Academy Alternative (3-12) Charter - - 2.08 242 - 12.30 57.02% 0.00% 9.50% 87.60% 0.41%
Texas Empowerment Academy Elementary Elementary (PK-2) Charter - - 2.08 157 - 16.80 50.96% 0.64% 6.37% 90.45% 0.64%
Ascent: An Acton Academy Private (PK-5) Private Nonsectarian Coed 2.34 65 - 9.10 - 72.31% 0.00% 3.08% 9.23%
Greater Calvary Academy Private (K-5) Private Nonsectarian Coed 2.40 7 - 2.30 - 0.00% 0.00% 100.00% 0.00%
Odyssey School Private (5-12) Private Nonsectarian Coed 2.46 56 - 4.70 - 75.00% 12.50% 5.36% 5.36%
University Of Texas Elementary Charter School Elementary (PK-5) Charter - - 2.54 296 65.50% 14.70 56.76% 13.51% 65.54% 15.88% 1.35%
Founders Classical Academy-Austin North Elementary (K-8) Charter - - 2.76 149 19.19% 9.30 43.62% 25.50% 43.62% 16.11% 7.38%
Magnolia Montessori For All Elementary (PK-6) Charter - - 2.78 456 37.41% 16.40 49.78% 31.14% 45.83% 10.09% 4.82%
Texas Preparatory School - Austin Campus Elementary (K-6) Charter - - 2.80 42 - 5.10 47.62% 2.38% 33.33% 47.62% 0.00%
Griffin School Private (9-12) Private Nonsectarian Coed 2.81 151 - 6.60 - 72.19% 13.91% 3.97% 7.28%
Austin Achieve Pflugerville Elementary (PK-8) Charter - - 2.83 171 10.40% 10.60 93.57% 1.75% 64.33% 32.75% 0.00%
Austin Achieve Northeast Elementary Elementary (PK-4) Charter - - 2.85 1,008 9.33% 16.10 90.97% 2.78% 80.56% 14.88% 0.50%

Environmental Health

Drinking Water Quality

Clean drinking water is essential for good health. Under the Safe Drinking Water Act, water systems are required to meet strict safety regulations. Maptimum’s Water Health Score assesses water systems based on the following key factors:

  • Population Served: Larger systems often have more resources and improved efficiency.
  • Source: Groundwater (such as wells) is typically safer than surface water (like rivers) because it is naturally filtered through soil and rock, reducing the risk of contamination.
  • Lead and Copper Levels: Lead and copper can enter drinking water from the corrosion of older pipes and plumbing. The 90th percentile of samples must meet EPA limits—0.015 mg/L for lead and 1.3 mg/L for copper.
  • Health-Based Violations: These occur when contaminant levels (like Lead or Chlorine) exceed safe standards, or when treatment processes fail.
  • Monitoring and Reporting Violations: Major violations where systems fail to properly monitor or report water quality.
  • Unresolved Violations: Health-based or major violations that have not been resolved according to the latest reports.

Remember, water systems often cover entire cities or regions, so moving within the same area may not significantly change your water quality.

Water System CITY OF AUSTIN WATER & WASTEWATER
Water Health Score 4.05 / 5 Good
Population Served 1,115,323
Primary Source Surface water
Lead and Copper (Latest Sampling)
Lead (Pb) 0.0000 mg/L Safe
Copper (Cu) No Data
Serious Violations (Last 5 Years)
Health Based 5
Monitoring/Reporting 0
Not Yet Resolved 0

Air Quality

Air quality directly impacts health, with pollution linked to multiple health concerns. Air quality can vary within a day and seasonally. Our analysis uses hourly data from the past 365 days, highlighting the percentage of time the Air Quality Index (AQI) and specific pollutants were in the dangerous range.

Poor or Very Poor Air Quality 0.31%
Worst Month October
Major Pollutant -
Pollutants
Bad or Very Bad SO2 0.00%
Bad or Very Bad NO2 0.00%
Bad or Very Bad PM10 0.00%
Bad or Very Bad PM2.5 0.00%
Bad or Very Bad O3 0.00%
Bad or Very Bad CO 0.00%

Hazardous Waste Sites

Hazardous waste sites near your home can pollute air, soil, and water, posing health risks like respiratory issues, contaminated drinking water, and long-term exposure to hazardous chemicals. Even compliant facilities, when densely clustered, can create cumulative environmental impacts that affect quality of life and property values.

We consider a facility high-risk based on a combination of the following criteria:

  • Active: Facilities with ongoing operations have a higher likelihood of environmental contamination.
  • Transport: Involvement in waste transport raises the risk of accidents or spills.
  • High Output: Large Quantity Generators (LQG) produce significant amounts of waste, posing greater risks.
  • TSDFs: Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities (TSDFs) handle hazardous waste, with a high potential for leaks and spills.
  • History of Violations: Past violations of EPA or state regulations indicate a higher risk of non-compliance and incidents.

All Sites 8
High-Risk Sites 1
High-Risk Sites per Square Mile 0.32
Closest High-Risk Site (mi) 0.09
Facility Types
Active 3
Transport 1
Large Quantity Generator 0
TSDFs 0
With Recent Violations 0

Noise Pollution

A Soundscore™ rating, ranging from 50 (indicating high noise levels) to 100 (signifying low noise levels), measures the environmental noise of a location, providing a quantifiable insight into the auditory environment you can expect.

Sound Score 76 (Active)
Sources of Noise
Airports Calm
Vehicular Traffic Active
Local Commercial and Community Active

Natural Risks

Earthquake Risk

This section utilizes Peak Ground Acceleration (PGA) data from the US Geological Survey (USGS) to forecast the maximum potential earthquake intensity and damage with a 2% probability of being exceeded in the area over the next 50 years, providing valuable insights into seismic risks.

PGA 0.03
Earthquake Risk Very Low

Flood Risk

The flood risk data, sourced from FEMA, assess the likelihood and potential impacts of flooding by considering various factors including flood frequency, proximity to water bodies, and property characteristics like elevation and rebuilding costs.

On the map, areas are designated as high risk or moderate risk:

  • High Risk: Classified as Special Flood Hazard Areas (SFHA), these regions face a 1% annual chance of flooding (equivalent to a 26% chance over a 30-year period, or a 100-year flood risk). In these areas, purchasing flood insurance is mandatory.
  • Moderate Risk: These zones have a 0.2% annual chance of flooding (equivalent to a 6% chance within a 30-year timeframe, or a 500-year flood risk). Flood insurance is recommended here. Such areas may transition to high-risk in the future due to factors like urban development or environmental changes.

Has High-Risk Zones Yes (Type: AE, AO)
Closest High-Risk Zone (mi) 0.09
Has Moderate-Risk Zones Yes (Type: X)

Lifestyle

Walkability and Bikeability

The Walk Score, ranging from 0 to 100, gauges an address's accessibility on foot—the higher the score, the easier it is to accomplish daily errands without a car.

Similarly, the Bike Score evaluates an area's suitability for cycling based on infrastructure, topography, proximity to key destinations, road connectivity, and the cycling community's presence.

Walk Score® 39 (Car-Dependent)
Bike Score® 57 (Bikeable)

Dating and Marriage Outlook

Gain insights into the area's potential for connections, dating, and finding life partners. This section explores the social landscape, highlighting marital status for residents 15 years and older and detailing the female-to-male ratio for those aged 20 to 44. A ratio above 1 indicates more women than men, suggesting enhanced dating prospects for men, and vice versa.

Marrital Status
Single, Never Married 47.37%
Married 38.53%
Other 14.09%
Female to Male Ratio 0.98

Pet Friendliness

Pets, especially dogs, provide a great way for locals to interact and build connections. If you have pets, you'll likely enjoy living in an area with a high percentage of fellow pet owners.

Has Any Pet 41.27%
Has Dog(s) 27.82%
Has Cat(s) 19.51%

Politics and Social Climate

Voting Patterns

Living in a community that shares your values can be important. Our detailed analysis of Presidential Election results at the precinct level—the most granular unit for voting data—allows you to understand the political tendencies of the area.

On the map, the precicits that intersect with your selected area, along with their vote count in the 2020 election, are presented:

  • Solid Democratic: Precincts where the Democratic margin (percentage voting for the Democratic candidate minus the percentage voting for the Republican candidate) exceeds 15%.
  • Leaning Democratic: Precincts where the Democratic margin is between 5% and 15%.
  • Balanced: Precincts where the democrat margin is between -5% and 5%.
  • Leaning Republican: Precincts where the Republican margin is between 5% and 15%.
  • Solid Republican: Precincts where the Republican margin exceeds 15%.

2020 Presidential Election Results
Joe Biden 89.01%
Donald Trump 9.00%

Ideological Leanings

Gain deeper insights into the social fabric of the neighborhood with data on self-reported ideological leanings, sourced from MRI-Simmons surveys.

Very Liberal 29.44%
Somewhat Liberal 34.29%
Somewhat Conservative 21.48%
Very Conservative 14.79%

Investment Insights

Value Appreciation Forecast

Our forecast uses the latest area-specific trends and market activities to offer a strategic overview of expected growth across the overall area, rather than for individual homes.

Median Home Value 621,338
5-Year Forecast Median Home Value 656,342
5-Year Appreciation Forecast 5.63%

Rental Viability Analysis

Gain insights into median rent and the rent-to-value ratio to identify promising rental investment opportunities. The 1% rule suggests a property is viable if the monthly rent is at least 1% of its value. Note that using area medians may skew this figure, especially if low-end homes dominate the rental market. Despite this, the ratio is a useful initial indicator for further exploration of rental investments.

Median Monthly Rent 1,890
Median Home Value 621,338
Rent to Value Ratio 0.30%
Leave us a review on Google
Did you find this report useful? Please take a moment to rate us on Google. We appreciate your feedback.

Disclaimer: Due to the dynamic nature of the housing market, the information in this report may not always reflect the most current or precise data. Maptimum is not responsible for any discrepancies or inaccuracies.