This is a sample Neighborhood Research Report. Sign up to create your personalized report for any address, neighborhood, ZIP code, or town in the US, free of charge.

This report was generated by Maptimum. Visit www.maptimum.com to create yours for any area in the U.S.

Neighborhood Report for Collister

This comprehensive research report provides up-to-date and accurate data, along with AI-powered analysis, on the following area:

Address Surroundings Created on
1.40-mi Radius 09/22/2024

Executive Summary

Fun Facts

  • Historical Roots: Collister is one of Boise's older neighborhoods, with a rich history dating back to the early 20th century. It was named after Dr. John Collister, a prominent local figure.
  • Architectural Diversity: The neighborhood boasts a variety of architectural styles, from charming mid-century homes to more modern constructions, reflecting its long history and gradual development.
  • Community Events: Collister hosts several community events throughout the year, including neighborhood potlucks and seasonal festivals, fostering a strong sense of community among residents.

Suitability

  • Families with Children: The area is moderately suitable for families with children due to the decent school district ranking (52nd percentile) and a low crime rate. However, the high flood risk may be a concern.
  • Retirees: Highly suitable for retirees, given the high proportion of seniors (26%) and the serene, low-crime environment. The neighborhood's quiet, residential nature and high owner-occupancy rate contribute to its appeal.
  • Young Professionals: Less suitable for young professionals due to the low walk score (0/100) and bike score (24/100), indicating a car-dependent lifestyle. The median age of 48.1 years also suggests a less vibrant, youthful community.

The Positive

  • Low Crime Rates: With property and personal crime indices significantly below the national average (15 and 20, respectively), Collister offers a very safe living environment.
  • High Education Levels: A substantial 66% of residents hold a college or graduate degree, indicating a well-educated community that values learning and intellectual growth.
  • Strong Real Estate Market: The median home value of $665,964 and a 5-year value appreciation forecast of 20.90% suggest a robust and growing real estate market, making it a good investment opportunity.

The Negative

  • High Flood Risk: The area has a high flood risk, which could lead to potential property damage and higher insurance costs. It's crucial to consider flood mitigation measures and insurance.
  • Car-Dependent Lifestyle: With a walk score of 0/100 and a bike score of 24/100, the neighborhood is highly car-dependent, which may not be ideal for those who prefer walking or biking.
  • Limited Rental Options: With only 7% renter-occupied housing, rental options are limited, making it challenging for those not looking to buy a home.

Alternatives

  • North End, Boise : Known for its historic charm and vibrant community, North End offers a higher walk score and more rental options. However, it may come with a higher price tag.
  • East End, Boise : This area provides a mix of historic and modern homes, excellent schools, and better walkability. It also has a strong sense of community and more amenities within walking distance.
  • Harris Ranch, Boise : A newer development with modern amenities, Harris Ranch offers a more bike-friendly environment and a variety of housing options, including rentals. It also has a lower flood risk compared to Collister.

Desirability Score

Measures how closely a neighborhood matches an ideal location, ignoring cost. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better suitability for the typical homebuyer.

73/100

Bang for the Buck Score

Measures the quality of life relative to cost. Scores range from 0 to 100; a score above 50 indicates good value, while below 50 suggests the area may be overpriced.

66/100

The People

Population

Rising population growth often signals a vibrant, growing community, leading to increased housing demand and potential for value appreciation. However, it's a double-edged sword; rapid growth might stretch local infrastructure and resources, possibly impacting the area's quality of life.

Population 3,379
Population (5-Year Projection) 3,501
5-Year Growth Forecast 3.61%
Density (Person per Square Mile) 549
Density Level Low

Household Composition

The makeup of households is a valuable insight for those seeking areas that resonate with family-oriented or child-friendly vibes.

Number of Households 1,369
Average Household Size 2.47
Household Makeup
Families with Kids 20.38%
Families without Kids 40.98%
Non-Families 38.64%

Age Groups

Age information is helpful for those aiming to align their living environment with their lifestyle preferences—whether you’re drawn to the energy and vibrancy of younger communities or the tranquility and maturity of areas with an older demographic.

Median Age 48.10
Age Groups
0-9 Years 9.94%
10-19 Years 10.83%
20-34 Years 11.07%
35-49 Years 20.69%
50-64 Years 21.07%
65+ Years 26.40%

Racial/Ethnic Composition

This breakdown helps pinpoint areas that align with your desire for cultural homogeneity or diversity.

Non-Hispanic White 85.88%
Hispanic 5.59%
Black/African American 1.33%
Asian 1.98%
Other 5.21%

The Economy

Education

Educational attainment percentages are for individuals aged 25 and older. Higher education levels in a community often correlate with increased civic engagement, safety, and prosperity.

Average Schooling Years 16.71
Educational Attainment Breakdown
Less than High School 2.01%
High School or Some College 31.75%
College Degree 35.66%
Graduate/Professional Degree 30.57%

Income Distribution

This section provides a detailed breakdown of household income levels in the area. Understanding a community's financial standing can reveal insights into its standard of living, economic diversity, and growth potential.

Median Household Income $116,200
On Food Stamps/SNAP 3.29%
Income Brackets
$0-$25K 5.19%
$25K-$50K 4.75%
$50K-$100K 30.09%
$100K-$200K 35.50%
$200K+ 24.47%

Labor Market

Labor force participation is the percentage of the 16+ population working or actively seeking work. A higher rate shows greater economic engagement.

People not in the labor force are those neither working nor seeking work, like retirees, students, or discouraged workers.

The unemployment rate is the percentage of the labor force without jobs. A lower rate signals a stronger job market with more opportunities.

Labor Force Participation Rate 68.38%
Unemployment Rate 3.58%

Housing

Occupancy Rates

Areas where most houses are owner-occupied (rather than rented) are more desirable because owners are more financially and emotionally invested in their properties and the community's well-being. High vacancy rates are a negative indicator, as they can signal that the area is in decline.

Total Housing Units 1,402
Occupancy
Owner Occupied 90.44%
Renter Occupied 7.20%
Vacant 2.35%

Age of Buildings

Reviewing the age of structures helps you understand the mix of modern and historic structures, anticipate the longevity of the infrastructure, and make informed investment decisions based on the area's growth and evolution.

Median Year Built 1991
Age Breakdown
New (Since 2020) 0.00%
Recent (2010-2019) 4.71%
Mid-Age (1980-2009) 63.62%
Old (Before 1980) 31.67%

Nearby Low-Income Housing

The availability of subsidized housing can influence neighborhood property values.

Main Types of Subsidized Housing:

  • Public Housing: Government-owned, managed by local authorities, offering affordable rents to low-income residents.
  • Project-Based Section 8: Private landlords provide reduced-rent apartments, subsidized by the government.
  • Low Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC): Incentivizes private developers with tax credits to create below-market rent properties for low-income tenants. LIHTC does not directly subsidize rents.

In the table below, Properties refer to distinct parcels of land or buildings designated as low-income housing. Units are the individual housing units (such as apartments) within those properties.

Total Properties 0
Closest Property (mi) -
Total Units 0
Units per Square Mile 0.00
Property Types
Public Housing -
Section 8 -
LIHTC -

Land Cover

Understanding a neighborhood's land cover helps you evaluate the aesthetic appeal, potential for recreational activities, and the balance of natural versus developed spaces.

Concise descriptions for each land cover category:

  • Landscaped Areas: Developed open spaces consisting mostly of vegetation, such as parks, golf courses, and residential gardens.
  • Residential Areas: Areas with a balanced mix of buildings and vegetation, such as single-family homes.
  • Urban & Commercial: Highly developed zones, including apartment complexes and commercial/industrial buildings.
  • Water Bodies: Open bodies of water like lakes, rivers, and ponds.
  • Wooded Areas: Forests dominated by tall trees, either deciduous, evergreen, or mixed.
  • Wild Vegetation: Areas with natural plant growth, including shrubs and herbaceous vegetation.
  • Farms & Gardens: Agricultural lands used for crops or livestock, such as fields of corn, soybeans, or pastures for grazing.
  • Marshes & Swamps: Wetlands either forested or grass-dominated.

Landscaped Areas 8.96%
Residential Areas 7.66%
Urban & Commercial 0.03%
Water Bodies 0.00%
Wooded Areas 0.00%
Wild Vegetation 83.24%
Farms & Gardens 0.10%
Marshes & Swamps 0.00%

Safety and Security

Crime Indexes

Crime Indexes compare local safety to a national average set at 100. For example, a crime index of 200 means the area has double the national average crime rate. Remember, the national average includes quieter rural areas, so urban centers may naturally show higher indexes.

  • Property crime involves private property, such as burglary and motor vehicle theft.
  • Personal crime is characterized as a violent crime that results in physical, emotional, or psychological harm to the victim, such as assault and battery.

Total Crime Index 16
Property Crime Index 15
Personal Crime Index 20

Fatal Car Accidents and DUIs

Government agencies release national fatal car accident data with a two-year delay. Extra caution is recommended in areas with higher accident frequencies.

You can see the exact location of fatal accidents on the map:

  • Non-DUI Accidents: Fatal accidents where the driver was not under the influence.
  • DUI Accidents: Fatal accidents where the driver was under the influence.

Data Period 2019-2022
All Fatal Accidents 1
Annual Fatal Accidents per Square Mile 0.04
Involving DUI 0.00%

Sex Offender Registry

This section provides detailed information from the Sex Offender Registry, including names, addresses, and specific convictions, to enhance your neighborhood safety awareness.

Total Sex Offenders 1
Sex Offenders per Square Mile 0.16
Closest Sex Offender (mi) 1.11
Conviction Type
Offense Against Children 1
Rape 0
Sexual Battery 0
Other Offense 0
# Photo Name and Address Distance Conviction
1 ERIC LEE TEETERS
5012 W HILL RD, BOISE, ID 83703-3521
1.11 mi Offense Against Children

Schools

Public School Districts

In many areas, students' options for attending public schools are determined by their residential address, linking them to specific school districts. Consequently, the quality of the schools within these districts plays a crucial role in shaping the educational outcomes of students. Additionally, high-performing school districts often indicate a strong community commitment to education, which can reflect positively on the neighborhood's overall desirability.

On the map, you will find the school districts that intersect with your selected area, along with detailed information about the nearby schools within each district.

Main District Boise City ISD 1
Grade Range PK-12
Number of Schools 51
Number of Students 22,809
Student/Teacher Ratio 15.67
State Rank 37 out of 77
State Rank Percentile 51.95%
Other Nearby Districts -
Name Level District Distance (mi) Students State Rank Percentile Student/Teacher Ratio On Lunch Subsidy White Hispanic Black Asian
Cynthia Mann Elementary School Elementary (PK-6) Boise Independent District 1.26 384 63.12% 17.00 27.86% 79.95% 10.42% 3.12% 1.82%
Pierce Park Elementary School Elementary (PK-6) Boise Independent District 1.68 219 39.20% 15.10 27.40% 85.84% 8.68% 1.37% 1.83%
Collister Elementary School Elementary (PK-6) Boise Independent District 1.78 261 93.36% 16.30 6.51% 72.03% 8.05% 0.77% 14.18%
Hillside Junior High School Middle (7-9) Boise Independent District 1.83 603 51.83% 16.20 26.53% 73.47% 8.96% 10.45% 3.48%
Riverglen Junior High School Middle (7-9) Boise Independent District 1.89 540 43.29% 13.30 27.22% 73.70% 15.74% 3.89% 0.74%
Shadow Hills Elementary Elementary (PK-6) Boise Independent District 2.34 445 46.84% 17.40 24.49% 79.33% 11.69% 1.80% 0.45%
Taft Elementary School Elementary (PK-6) Boise Independent District 2.79 270 1.66% 14.00 99.26% 51.11% 11.85% 20.00% 10.74%
Hidden Springs Elementary School Elementary (PK-6) Boise Independent District 3.11 288 90.37% 17.50 4.51% 84.03% 6.25% 2.43% 0.35%
Highlands Elementary School Elementary (PK-6) Boise Independent District 3.24 294 98.01% 17.20 3.06% 89.12% 4.42% 0.00% 1.02%
Capital Senior High School High (9-12) Boise Independent District 3.26 1,220 30.82% 16.80 27.54% 62.62% 22.05% 5.98% 3.93%
Mountain View Elementary School Elementary (PK-6) Boise Independent District 3.38 312 60.80% 16.00 31.41% 78.53% 13.14% 3.53% 0.32%
Lowell Elementary School Elementary (PK-6) Boise Independent District 3.40 295 61.79% 15.10 24.07% 80.34% 10.51% 3.05% 1.02%
Valley View Elementary School Elementary (PK-6) Boise Independent District 3.71 350 55.15% 17.90 35.71% 67.14% 21.14% 2.86% 1.71%
Washington Elementary School Elementary (PK-6) Boise Independent District 3.86 260 93.02% 16.90 8.46% 84.23% 9.23% 0.00% 0.77%
Whittier Elementary School Elementary (PK-6) Boise Independent District 4.07 572 21.26% 17.30 98.78% 45.10% 36.19% 11.89% 2.80%
Koelsch Elementary School Elementary (PK-6) Boise Independent District 4.12 320 1.00% 16.40 99.06% 53.12% 27.50% 12.50% 2.19%
Morley Nelson Elementary Elementary (PK-6) Boise Independent District 4.24 459 13.29% 17.40 98.91% 52.07% 26.58% 13.51% 2.83%
Fairmont Junior High School Middle (7-9) Boise Independent District 4.25 677 29.27% 14.40 40.62% 57.31% 27.03% 7.53% 3.40%
Longfellow Elementary School Elementary (PK-6) Boise Independent District 4.30 255 83.06% 15.40 8.24% 81.18% 10.20% 0.00% 3.14%
North Junior High School Middle (7-9) Boise Independent District 4.31 876 68.90% 17.40 11.99% 82.08% 9.13% 2.74% 0.80%
Boise Senior High School High (9-12) Boise Independent District 4.62 1,588 40.25% 18.60 15.11% 76.76% 10.39% 5.48% 2.90%

Charter, Magnet, and Private Schools

For families seeking alternatives to traditional public schools, several options are available:

  • Charter Schools: Publicly funded but independently run, charter schools offer innovative curriculums and may enroll students from any area.
  • Magnet Schools: Specializing in areas like science, the arts, or technology, magnet schools attract students from multiple districts with unique programs.
  • Private Schools: Privately funded, these schools are not bound by many of the public school regulations and often provide customized educational experiences with smaller class sizes.

The map displays nearby charter, magnet, and private schools (if any) along with key information about each.

Name Level Type Faith Affiliation Coed Distance (mi) Students State Rank Percentile Student/Teacher Ratio On Lunch Subsidy White Hispanic Black Asian
Hillside Academy Private (PK-1) Private Nonsectarian Coed 1.66 25 - 4.50 - 36.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Treasure Valley Math/Science Alternative (4-12) Magnet - - 1.89 12 - 1.10 - 91.67% 0.00% 0.00% 8.33%
Learning Tree Inc Private (PK-K) Private Nonsectarian Coed 2.63 87 - 6.90 - 29.89% 0.00% 0.00% 1.15%
Vineyard Christian Academy Private (PK-8) Private Christian (no specific denomination) Coed 2.86 53 - 6.00 - 69.81% 9.43% 3.77% 5.66%
Future Public School Elementary (K-6) Charter - - 3.06 410 65.78% 18.60 42.20% 62.68% 15.12% 10.98% 3.66%
Anser Charter School Elementary (PK-8) Charter - - 3.32 502 54.82% 13.70 20.92% 83.07% 10.36% 0.40% 1.00%
Rolling Hills Public Charter Elementary (K-8) Charter - - 3.49 238 43.52% 14.90 25.63% 72.27% 17.65% 0.84% 0.42%
St Marys School Private (PK-8) Private Roman Catholic Coed 3.58 158 - 8.50 - 60.13% 21.52% 1.27% 1.90%
Cloverdale Montessori Private (PK-K) Private Nonsectarian Coed 3.73 40 - 7.00 - 10.00% 0.00% 2.50% 5.00%
Northview Montessori Preschool And Kindergarten Private (PK-K) Private Nonsectarian Coed 4.14 80 - 10.00 - 21.25% 3.75% 0.00% 0.00%
St Marks Elementary School Private (PK-8) Private Roman Catholic Coed 4.15 359 - 14.80 - 67.13% 15.32% 0.84% 1.39%
Cole Valley Christian School Private (7-12) Private Christian (no specific denomination) Coed 4.16 548 - 14.40 - 96.35% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Summerwind Stem Academy Elementary (PK-5) Magnet - - 4.40 372 86.05% 14.50 40.05% 72.31% 11.56% 6.72% 1.88%
Wesleyan Preschool & Kindergarten Private (PK-K) Private Methodist Coed 4.55 66 - 7.70 - 19.70% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
The Children's School Of Boise Private (PK-2) Private Nonsectarian Coed 4.59 82 - 7.80 - 18.29% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
St Joseph's Catholic School Private (K-8) Private Roman Catholic Coed 4.68 403 - 17.20 - 84.62% 6.20% 1.24% 0.50%
Village Leadership Academy Elementary (PK-8) Charter - - 4.77 231 - 12.80 - 73.16% 15.15% 0.87% 1.73%
Hall Institute For The Arts Private (7-12) Private Nonsectarian Coed 4.85 22 - 3.30 - 63.64% 9.09% 4.55% 13.64%

Environmental Health

Air Quality

Air quality directly impacts health, with pollution linked to multiple health concerns. Air quality can vary within a day and seasonally. Our analysis uses hourly data from the past 365 days, highlighting the percentage of time the Air Quality Index (AQI) and specific pollutants were in the dangerous range.

Poor or Very Poor Air Quality 3.86%
Worst Month July
Major Pollutant PM2.5
Pollutants
Bad or Very Bad SO2 0.00%
Bad or Very Bad NO2 0.06%
Bad or Very Bad PM10 0.83%
Bad or Very Bad PM2.5 2.20%
Bad or Very Bad O3 2.02%
Bad or Very Bad CO 0.00%

Hazardous Waste Sites

Hazardous waste sites near your home can pollute air, soil, and water, posing health risks like respiratory issues, contaminated drinking water, and long-term exposure to hazardous chemicals. Even compliant facilities, when densely clustered, can create cumulative environmental impacts that affect quality of life and property values.

We consider a facility high-risk based on a combination of the following criteria:

  • Active: Facilities with ongoing operations have a higher likelihood of environmental contamination.
  • Transport: Involvement in waste transport raises the risk of accidents or spills.
  • High Output: Large Quantity Generators (LQG) produce significant amounts of waste, posing greater risks.
  • TSDFs: Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities (TSDFs) handle hazardous waste, with a high potential for leaks and spills.
  • History of Violations: Past violations of EPA or state regulations indicate a higher risk of non-compliance and incidents.

All Sites 0
High-Risk Sites 0
High-Risk Sites per Square Mile 0.00
Closest High-Risk Site (mi) -
Facility Types
Active 0
Transport 0
Large Quantity Generator 0
TSDFs 0
With Recent Violations 0

Noise Pollution

A Soundscore™ rating, ranging from 50 (indicating high noise levels) to 100 (signifying low noise levels), measures the environmental noise of a location, providing a quantifiable insight into the auditory environment you can expect.

Sound Score -
Sources of Noise
Airports -
Vehicular Traffic -
Local Commercial and Community -

Natural Risks

Earthquake Risk

This section utilizes Peak Ground Acceleration (PGA) data from the US Geological Survey (USGS) to forecast the maximum potential earthquake intensity and damage with a 2% probability of being exceeded in the area over the next 50 years, providing valuable insights into seismic risks.

PGA 0.14
Earthquake Risk Low

Flood Risk

The flood risk data, sourced from FEMA, assess the likelihood and potential impacts of flooding by considering various factors including flood frequency, proximity to water bodies, and property characteristics like elevation and rebuilding costs.

On the map, areas are designated as high risk or moderate risk:

  • High Risk: Classified as Special Flood Hazard Areas (SFHA), these regions face a 1% annual chance of flooding (equivalent to a 26% chance over a 30-year period, or a 100-year flood risk). In these areas, purchasing flood insurance is mandatory.
  • Moderate Risk: These zones have a 0.2% annual chance of flooding (equivalent to a 6% chance within a 30-year timeframe, or a 500-year flood risk). Flood insurance is recommended here. Such areas may transition to high-risk in the future due to factors like urban development or environmental changes.

Has High-Risk Zones Yes (Type: A, AO, AE)
Closest High-Risk Zone (mi) 0.41
Has Moderate-Risk Zones Yes (Type: X)

Lifestyle

Walkability and Bikeability

The Walk Score, ranging from 0 to 100, gauges an address's accessibility on foot—the higher the score, the easier it is to accomplish daily errands without a car.

Similarly, the Bike Score evaluates an area's suitability for cycling based on infrastructure, topography, proximity to key destinations, road connectivity, and the cycling community's presence.

Walk Score® 0 (Car-Dependent)
Bike Score® 24 (Somewhat Bikeable)

Dating and Marriage Outlook

Gain insights into the area's potential for connections, dating, and finding life partners. This section explores the social landscape, highlighting marital status for residents 15 years and older and detailing the female-to-male ratio for those aged 20 to 44. A ratio above 1 indicates more women than men, suggesting enhanced dating prospects for men, and vice versa.

Marrital Status
Single, Never Married 26.27%
Married 62.98%
Other 10.75%
Female to Male Ratio 1.01

Pet Friendliness

Pets, especially dogs, provide a great way for locals to interact and build connections. If you have pets, you'll likely enjoy living in an area with a high percentage of fellow pet owners.

Has Any Pet 54.71%
Has Dog(s) 42.07%
Has Cat(s) 23.30%

Politics and Social Climate

Voting Patterns

Living in a community that shares your values can be important. Our detailed analysis of Presidential Election results at the precinct level—the most granular unit for voting data—allows you to understand the political tendencies of the area.

On the map, the precicits that intersect with your selected area, along with their vote count in the 2020 election, are presented:

  • Solid Democratic: Precincts where the Democratic margin (percentage voting for the Democratic candidate minus the percentage voting for the Republican candidate) exceeds 15%.
  • Leaning Democratic: Precincts where the Democratic margin is between 5% and 15%.
  • Balanced: Precincts where the democrat margin is between -5% and 5%.
  • Leaning Republican: Precincts where the Republican margin is between 5% and 15%.
  • Solid Republican: Precincts where the Republican margin exceeds 15%.

2020 Presidential Election Results
Joe Biden 57.89%
Donald Trump 39.59%

Ideological Leanings

Gain deeper insights into the social fabric of the neighborhood with data on self-reported ideological leanings, sourced from MRI-Simmons surveys.

Very Liberal 13.35%
Somewhat Liberal 26.09%
Somewhat Conservative 35.64%
Very Conservative 24.92%

Investment Insights

Value Appreciation Forecast

Our forecast uses the latest area-specific trends and market activities to offer a strategic overview of expected growth across the overall area, rather than for individual homes.

Median Home Value 665,964
5-Year Forecast Median Home Value 805,174
5-Year Appreciation Forecast 20.90%

Rental Viability Analysis

Gain insights into median rent and the rent-to-value ratio to identify promising rental investment opportunities. The 1% rule suggests a property is viable if the monthly rent is at least 1% of its value. Note that using area medians may skew this figure, especially if low-end homes dominate the rental market. Despite this, the ratio is a useful initial indicator for further exploration of rental investments.

Median Monthly Rent 2,240
Median Home Value 665,964
Rent to Value Ratio 0.34%
Leave us a review on Google
Did you find this report useful? Please take a moment to rate us on Google. We appreciate your feedback.

Disclaimer: Due to the dynamic nature of the housing market, the information in this report may not always reflect the most current or precise data. Maptimum is not responsible for any discrepancies or inaccuracies.