This is a sample Neighborhood Research Report. Sign up to create your personalized report for any address, neighborhood, ZIP code, or town in the US, free of charge.

This report was generated by Maptimum. Visit www.maptimum.com to create yours for any area in the U.S.

Neighborhood Report for Berkeley Street

This comprehensive research report provides up-to-date and accurate data, along with AI-powered analysis, on the following area:

Address Surroundings Created on
0.50-mi Radius 11/11/2024

Executive Summary

Fun Facts

  • Historical Roots: Lawrence, MA, known as the "Immigrant City," has a rich history of welcoming diverse populations, particularly during the industrial boom of the 19th century.
  • Architectural Charm: The neighborhood features many homes built before 1980, showcasing classic New England architecture with charming details.
  • Cultural Hub: The area is predominantly Hispanic, offering a vibrant cultural scene with numerous festivals and events celebrating Latin American heritage.

Suitability

  • Family-Friendly Environment: With 47% of households being families with children, the area is well-suited for your family-oriented lifestyle.
  • Diverse Community: The neighborhood's 86% Hispanic population aligns with your preference for a culturally diverse environment.
  • School Quality Concerns: The Lawrence School District ranks low in the state, which may not meet your expectations for educational quality.
  • Safety Considerations: The personal crime index is above the national average, which could be a concern for your family's safety.
  • Overall Conclusion: While the area offers diversity and a family-friendly atmosphere, concerns about school quality and safety may warrant further consideration.

The Positive

  • Strong Rental Market: With 61% of homes renter-occupied, the area offers a robust rental market, providing flexibility and options for tenants.
  • Walkability: A walk score of 79 indicates that daily errands and activities can be accomplished on foot, enhancing convenience and reducing reliance on cars.
  • Political Alignment: The area leans liberal, with 67% voting for Biden in 2020, aligning with your political preferences.

The Negative

  • High Flood Risk: The area is prone to flooding, which could pose a risk to property and personal safety. Consider flood insurance and preparedness measures.
  • Limited Natural Scenery: With only 2% landscaped areas, the neighborhood lacks serene natural spaces, which may not meet your preference for a more tranquil environment.
  • Older Housing Stock: With 80.72% of buildings constructed before 1980, maintenance and modernization could be a concern for renters seeking updated amenities.

Alternatives

  • Andover, MA : Offers excellent schools and a more suburban feel with plenty of parks and green spaces. However, it may be less diverse and more expensive.
  • North Andover, MA : Provides a balance of good schools and a family-friendly atmosphere with a slightly more diverse population than Andover.
  • Haverhill, MA : Features a mix of urban and suburban living with a growing arts scene and more affordable housing options, though it may not be as walkable.

Desirability Score

Measures how closely a neighborhood matches an ideal location, ignoring cost. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better suitability for the typical homebuyer.

40/100

Bang for the Buck Score

Measures the quality of life relative to cost. Scores range from 0 to 100; a score above 50 indicates good value, while below 50 suggests the area may be overpriced.

37/100

The People

Population

Rising population growth often signals a vibrant, growing community, leading to increased housing demand and potential for value appreciation. However, it's a double-edged sword; rapid growth might stretch local infrastructure and resources, possibly impacting the area's quality of life.

Population 16,333
Population (5-Year Projection) 16,737
5-Year Growth Forecast 2.47%
Density (Person per Square Mile) 20,675
Density Level High

Household Composition

The makeup of households is a valuable insight for those seeking areas that resonate with family-oriented or child-friendly vibes.

Number of Households 4,825
Average Household Size 3.39
Household Makeup
Families with Kids 46.98%
Families without Kids 34.38%
Non-Families 18.63%

Age Groups

Age information is helpful for those aiming to align their living environment with their lifestyle preferences—whether you’re drawn to the energy and vibrancy of younger communities or the tranquility and maturity of areas with an older demographic.

Median Age 33.40
Age Groups
0-9 Years 13.89%
10-19 Years 14.83%
20-34 Years 23.69%
35-49 Years 19.45%
50-64 Years 17.42%
65+ Years 10.73%

Racial/Ethnic Composition

This breakdown helps pinpoint areas that align with your desire for cultural homogeneity or diversity.

Non-Hispanic White 9.84%
Hispanic 85.97%
Black/African American 2.11%
Asian 0.65%
Other 1.44%

The Economy

Education

Educational attainment percentages are for individuals aged 25 and older. Higher education levels in a community often correlate with increased civic engagement, safety, and prosperity.

Average Schooling Years 13.12
Educational Attainment Breakdown
Less than High School 25.56%
High School or Some College 60.35%
College Degree 10.09%
Graduate/Professional Degree 3.99%

Income Distribution

This section provides a detailed breakdown of household income levels in the area. Understanding a community's financial standing can reveal insights into its standard of living, economic diversity, and growth potential.

Median Household Income $63,500
On Food Stamps/SNAP 42.40%
Income Brackets
$0-$25K 16.19%
$25K-$50K 21.08%
$50K-$100K 36.66%
$100K-$200K 21.93%
$200K+ 4.17%

Labor Market

Labor force participation is the percentage of the 16+ population working or actively seeking work. A higher rate shows greater economic engagement.

People not in the labor force are those neither working nor seeking work, like retirees, students, or discouraged workers.

The unemployment rate is the percentage of the labor force without jobs. A lower rate signals a stronger job market with more opportunities.

Labor Force Participation Rate 67.96%
Unemployment Rate 7.15%

Housing

Occupancy Rates

Areas where most houses are owner-occupied (rather than rented) are more desirable because owners are more financially and emotionally invested in their properties and the community's well-being. High vacancy rates are a negative indicator, as they can signal that the area is in decline.

Total Housing Units 4,994
Occupancy
Owner Occupied 35.46%
Renter Occupied 61.15%
Vacant 3.38%

Age of Buildings

Reviewing the age of structures helps you understand the mix of modern and historic structures, anticipate the longevity of the infrastructure, and make informed investment decisions based on the area's growth and evolution.

Median Year Built 1940
Age Breakdown
New (Since 2020) 0.00%
Recent (2010-2019) 5.31%
Mid-Age (1980-2009) 13.98%
Old (Before 1980) 80.72%

Nearby Low-Income Housing

The availability of subsidized housing can influence neighborhood property values.

Main Types of Subsidized Housing:

  • Public Housing: Government-owned, managed by local authorities, offering affordable rents to low-income residents.
  • Project-Based Section 8: Private landlords provide reduced-rent apartments, subsidized by the government.
  • Low Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC): Incentivizes private developers with tax credits to create below-market rent properties for low-income tenants. LIHTC does not directly subsidize rents.

In the table below, Properties refer to distinct parcels of land or buildings designated as low-income housing. Units are the individual housing units (such as apartments) within those properties.

Total Properties 3
Closest Property (mi) 0.21
Total Units 316
Units per Square Mile 400.00
Property Types
Public Housing -
Section 8 2 (299 Units)
LIHTC 1 (17 Units)

Land Cover

Understanding a neighborhood's land cover helps you evaluate the aesthetic appeal, potential for recreational activities, and the balance of natural versus developed spaces.

Concise descriptions for each land cover category:

  • Landscaped Areas: Developed open spaces consisting mostly of vegetation, such as parks, golf courses, and residential gardens.
  • Residential Areas: Areas with a balanced mix of buildings and vegetation, such as single-family homes.
  • Urban & Commercial: Highly developed zones, including apartment complexes and commercial/industrial buildings.
  • Water Bodies: Open bodies of water like lakes, rivers, and ponds.
  • Wooded Areas: Forests dominated by tall trees, either deciduous, evergreen, or mixed.
  • Wild Vegetation: Areas with natural plant growth, including shrubs and herbaceous vegetation.
  • Farms & Gardens: Agricultural lands used for crops or livestock, such as fields of corn, soybeans, or pastures for grazing.
  • Marshes & Swamps: Wetlands either forested or grass-dominated.

Landscaped Areas 1.73%
Residential Areas 46.20%
Urban & Commercial 50.84%
Water Bodies 0.00%
Wooded Areas 1.23%
Wild Vegetation 0.00%
Farms & Gardens 0.00%
Marshes & Swamps 0.00%

Safety and Security

Crime Indexes

Crime Indexes compare local safety to a national average set at 100. For example, a crime index of 200 means the area has double the national average crime rate. Remember, the national average includes quieter rural areas, so urban centers may naturally show higher indexes.

  • Property crime involves private property, such as burglary and motor vehicle theft.
  • Personal crime is characterized as a violent crime that results in physical, emotional, or psychological harm to the victim, such as assault and battery.

Total Crime Index 56
Property Crime Index 45
Personal Crime Index 116

Fatal Car Accidents and DUIs

Government agencies release national fatal car accident data with a two-year delay. Extra caution is recommended in areas with higher accident frequencies.

You can see the exact location of fatal accidents on the map:

  • Non-DUI Accidents: Fatal accidents where the driver was not under the influence.
  • DUI Accidents: Fatal accidents where the driver was under the influence.

Data Period 2019-2022
All Fatal Accidents 1
Annual Fatal Accidents per Square Mile 0.32
Involving DUI 0.00%

Sex Offender Registry

This section provides detailed information from the Sex Offender Registry, including names, addresses, and specific convictions, to enhance your neighborhood safety awareness.

Total Sex Offenders 7
Sex Offenders per Square Mile 8.86
Closest Sex Offender (mi) 0.14
Conviction Type
Offense Against Children 5
Rape 1
Sexual Battery 1
Other Offense 0
# Photo Name and Address Distance Conviction
1 ZACHARIAS ALAN PRESCOTT
8 ALLYN TER APT 1 FL, LAWRENCE, MA 01841
0.14 mi Offense Against Children
2 GERMAN CASTILLO
356 JACKSON ST Suite 1st floor rear, LAWRENCE, MA 01844
0.19 mi Offense Against Children
3 ANACLETO HERNANDEZ APONTE
161 BERKELEY ST APT 3, LAWRENCE, MA 01841
0.22 mi Sexual Battery
4 JEROME TORRES
315 PROSPECT ST APT 3 FL, LAWRENCE, MA 01841
0.32 mi Offense Against Children
5 ANTHONY SIMMONS
227 LAWRENCE ST, LAWRENCE, MA 01841
0.35 mi Offense Against Children
6 CHRISTIAN BAEZ
420 HIGH ST, LAWRENCE, MA 01841
0.37 mi Rape
7 NICHOLAS JIMENEZ
99 EAST ST, METHUEN, MA 01844
0.47 mi Offense Against Children

Schools

Public School Districts

In many areas, students' options for attending public schools are determined by their residential address, linking them to specific school districts. Consequently, the quality of the schools within these districts plays a crucial role in shaping the educational outcomes of students. Additionally, high-performing school districts often indicate a strong community commitment to education, which can reflect positively on the neighborhood's overall desirability.

On the map, you will find the school districts that intersect with your selected area, along with detailed information about the nearby schools within each district.

Main District Lawrence School District
Grade Range PK-12
Number of Schools 26
Number of Students 12,885
Student/Teacher Ratio 11.22
State Rank 340 out of 351
State Rank Percentile 3.13%
Other Nearby Districts Methuen School District
Name Level District Distance (mi) Students State Rank Percentile Student/Teacher Ratio On Lunch Subsidy White Hispanic Black Asian
Lawlor Early Childhood Center Elementary (PK-K) Lawrence 0.32 164 - 11.70 - 2.44% 95.73% 1.22% 0.61%
John K Tarbox Elementary (1-5) Lawrence 0.52 275 21.62% 11.40 - 2.18% 97.09% 0.36% 0.00%
High School Learning Center High (9-12) Lawrence 0.66 310 - 19.80 - 0.97% 98.39% 0.32% 0.00%
Oliver Middle School Middle (6-8) Lawrence 0.66 351 16.02% 12.10 - 3.13% 94.59% 1.42% 0.85%
Oliver Elementary School Elementary (1-5) Lawrence 0.72 433 0.87% 9.80 - 1.85% 96.07% 1.62% 0.00%
Arlington Middle School Middle (5-8) Lawrence 0.72 575 10.55% 12.20 - 1.22% 97.91% 0.52% 0.00%
Arlington Elementary Elementary (K-4) Lawrence 0.72 579 1.42% 9.10 - 1.90% 96.03% 0.86% 0.00%
Rollins Early Childhood Center Elementary (PK-K) Lawrence 0.73 202 - 13.40 - 2.97% 93.56% 1.98% 0.50%
Leonard Middle School Middle (6-8) Lawrence 0.82 327 1.42% 15.00 - 1.22% 98.17% 0.61% 0.00%
Edward F. Parthum Elementary (K-4) Lawrence 0.87 677 16.27% 14.10 - 3.55% 93.65% 1.62% 0.15%
Parthum Middle School Middle (5-8) Lawrence 0.87 568 32.45% 13.50 - 3.87% 94.37% 1.23% 0.35%
RISE Academy High (7-12) Lawrence 0.89 56 - 6.30 - 1.79% 96.43% 0.00% 0.00%
Donald P Timony Grammar Elementary (K-8) Methuen 0.97 1,263 18.78% 12.30 - 33.57% 54.24% 6.89% 3.17%
Methuen High High (9-12) Methuen 1.07 1,916 28.16% 12.90 - 39.82% 48.17% 5.53% 4.38%
Tenney Grammar School Elementary (K-8) Methuen 1.23 1,254 18.34% 12.50 - 27.91% 62.28% 4.55% 2.71%
Francis M Leahy Elementary (PK-5) Lawrence 1.32 380 0.55% 9.70 - 1.32% 97.37% 1.05% 0.00%
Alexander B Bruce Middle (3-8) Lawrence 1.55 409 12.37% 8.30 - 2.20% 93.15% 2.20% 1.47%
Gerard A. Guilmette Elementary (1-4) Lawrence 1.59 481 0.66% 9.00 - 2.49% 93.97% 1.46% 1.46%
Guilmette Middle School Middle (5-8) Lawrence 1.59 459 20.49% 8.70 - 1.53% 94.34% 2.40% 1.31%
Lawrence Family Public Academy Elementary (PK-K) Lawrence 1.74 189 - 10.50 - 3.70% 93.12% 1.59% 0.53%
John Breen School Elementary (PK-K) Lawrence 1.77 258 - 10.50 - 5.04% 89.53% 2.33% 2.71%
Emily G Wetherbee Elementary (K-8) Lawrence 1.77 495 14.63% 7.70 - 2.42% 94.75% 0.81% 1.41%
James F Hennessey Elementary (PK-2) Lawrence 1.78 317 - 9.10 - 4.73% 92.11% 2.52% 0.32%
South Lawrence East Elementary School Elementary (1-5) Lawrence 1.84 653 23.36% 12.60 - 3.37% 91.12% 1.38% 3.06%
Spark Academy Middle (6-8) Lawrence 1.84 437 33.67% 10.90 - 3.66% 94.74% 0.46% 1.14%
Comprehensive Grammar School Elementary (K-8) Methuen 2.08 955 30.79% 10.30 - 41.99% 45.97% 6.07% 3.66%
Lawrence High School High (9-12) Lawrence 2.18 3,084 5.46% 13.10 - 2.27% 94.10% 1.23% 1.59%
Robert Frost Elementary (K-4) Lawrence 2.43 572 29.04% 12.10 - 6.29% 86.71% 2.27% 3.15%
Frost Middle School Middle (5-8) Lawrence 2.43 514 22.92% 14.00 - 6.61% 89.30% 1.56% 1.95%

Charter, Magnet, and Private Schools

For families seeking alternatives to traditional public schools, several options are available:

  • Charter Schools: Publicly funded but independently run, charter schools offer innovative curriculums and may enroll students from any area.
  • Magnet Schools: Specializing in areas like science, the arts, or technology, magnet schools attract students from multiple districts with unique programs.
  • Private Schools: Privately funded, these schools are not bound by many of the public school regulations and often provide customized educational experiences with smaller class sizes.

The map displays nearby charter, magnet, and private schools (if any) along with key information about each.

Name Level Type Faith Affiliation Coed Distance (mi) Students State Rank Percentile Student/Teacher Ratio On Lunch Subsidy White Hispanic Black Asian
Central Catholic High School Private (9-12) Private Roman Catholic Coed 0.70 1,181 - 14.20 - 76.97% 13.63% 3.05% 6.10%
Esperanza Academy Private (5-8) Private Episcopal Girls 0.75 57 - 6.30 - 0.00% 3.51% 1.75% 1.75%
Community Day Charter Public School Elementary (PK-8) Charter - - 0.82 1,195 53.17% 10.30 - 1.84% 95.73% 1.34% 0.42%
Phoenix Academy Public Charter High School Lawrence High (9-12) Charter - - 0.82 125 - 10.40 - 14.40% 80.80% 3.20% 0.00%
Blessed Stephen Bellesini O.S.A. Academy Private (5-8) Private Roman Catholic Coed 0.94 121 - 12.10 - 0.00% 86.78% 7.44% 5.79%
Lawrence Family Development Charter School Elementary (PK-8) Charter - - 1.02 854 17.69% 20.20 - 0.70% 98.83% 0.23% 0.00%
Community Kindergarten Of Methuen Private (PK-K) Private Nonsectarian Coed 1.09 27 - 7.00 - 7.41% 18.52% 0.00% 0.00%
Notre Dame Cristo Rey High School Private (9-12) Private Roman Catholic Coed 1.10 299 - 12.40 - 0.33% 95.32% 1.34% 0.67%
Presentation Of Mary Academy Private (9-12) Private Roman Catholic Coed 1.20 147 - 8.50 - 42.86% 39.46% 4.08% 7.48%
St Monica School Private (PK-8) Private Roman Catholic Coed 1.27 252 - 16.60 - 49.21% 23.41% 8.33% 1.98%
Lawrence Catholic Academy Private (PK-8) Private Roman Catholic Coed 1.52 392 - 14.10 - 4.59% 77.55% 3.57% 1.02%
The Islamic Academy For Peace Private (PK-8) Private Islamic Coed 1.63 114 - 6.20 - 16.67% 0.00% 3.51% 30.70%
St Michael Elementary School Private (PK-8) Private Roman Catholic Coed 2.00 511 - 17.00 - 66.34% 12.33% 3.33% 4.70%
Glcac Child Care Center Private (K) Private Nonsectarian Coed 2.13 17 - 8.50 - 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% 0.00%
St Ann's Home Private (PK-11) Private Nonsectarian Coed 2.19 130 - 7.10 - 60.00% 16.92% 13.85% 3.85%

Environmental Health

Drinking Water Quality

Clean drinking water is essential for good health. Under the Safe Drinking Water Act, water systems are required to meet strict safety regulations. Maptimum’s Water Health Score assesses water systems based on the following key factors:

  • Population Served: Larger systems often have more resources and improved efficiency.
  • Source: Groundwater (such as wells) is typically safer than surface water (like rivers) because it is naturally filtered through soil and rock, reducing the risk of contamination.
  • Lead and Copper Levels: Lead and copper can enter drinking water from the corrosion of older pipes and plumbing. The 90th percentile of samples must meet EPA limits—0.015 mg/L for lead and 1.3 mg/L for copper.
  • Health-Based Violations: These occur when contaminant levels (like Lead or Chlorine) exceed safe standards, or when treatment processes fail.
  • Monitoring and Reporting Violations: Major violations where systems fail to properly monitor or report water quality.
  • Unresolved Violations: Health-based or major violations that have not been resolved according to the latest reports.

Remember, water systems often cover entire cities or regions, so moving within the same area may not significantly change your water quality.

Water System LAWRENCE WATER WORKS
Water Health Score 4.20 / 5 Good
Population Served 80,162
Primary Source Surface water
Lead and Copper (Latest Sampling)
Lead (Pb) 0.0020 mg/L Safe
Copper (Cu) No Data
Serious Violations (Last 5 Years)
Health Based 0
Monitoring/Reporting 1
Not Yet Resolved 0

Air Quality

Air quality directly impacts health, with pollution linked to multiple health concerns. Air quality can vary within a day and seasonally. Our analysis uses hourly data from the past 365 days, highlighting the percentage of time the Air Quality Index (AQI) and specific pollutants were in the dangerous range.

Poor or Very Poor Air Quality 0.90%
Worst Month September
Major Pollutant O3
Pollutants
Bad or Very Bad SO2 0.00%
Bad or Very Bad NO2 0.00%
Bad or Very Bad PM10 0.00%
Bad or Very Bad PM2.5 0.00%
Bad or Very Bad O3 0.46%
Bad or Very Bad CO 0.00%

Hazardous Waste Sites

Hazardous waste sites near your home can pollute air, soil, and water, posing health risks like respiratory issues, contaminated drinking water, and long-term exposure to hazardous chemicals. Even compliant facilities, when densely clustered, can create cumulative environmental impacts that affect quality of life and property values.

We consider a facility high-risk based on a combination of the following criteria:

  • Active: Facilities with ongoing operations have a higher likelihood of environmental contamination.
  • Transport: Involvement in waste transport raises the risk of accidents or spills.
  • High Output: Large Quantity Generators (LQG) produce significant amounts of waste, posing greater risks.
  • TSDFs: Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities (TSDFs) handle hazardous waste, with a high potential for leaks and spills.
  • History of Violations: Past violations of EPA or state regulations indicate a higher risk of non-compliance and incidents.

All Sites 15
High-Risk Sites 0
High-Risk Sites per Square Mile 0.00
Closest High-Risk Site (mi) -
Facility Types
Active 11
Transport 0
Large Quantity Generator 0
TSDFs 0
With Recent Violations 0

Noise Pollution

A Soundscore™ rating, ranging from 50 (indicating high noise levels) to 100 (signifying low noise levels), measures the environmental noise of a location, providing a quantifiable insight into the auditory environment you can expect.

Sound Score 71 (Active)
Sources of Noise
Airports Calm
Vehicular Traffic Active
Local Commercial and Community Active

Natural Risks

Earthquake Risk

This section utilizes Peak Ground Acceleration (PGA) data from the US Geological Survey (USGS) to forecast the maximum potential earthquake intensity and damage with a 2% probability of being exceeded in the area over the next 50 years, providing valuable insights into seismic risks.

PGA 0.22
Earthquake Risk Moderate

Flood Risk

The flood risk data, sourced from FEMA, assess the likelihood and potential impacts of flooding by considering various factors including flood frequency, proximity to water bodies, and property characteristics like elevation and rebuilding costs.

On the map, areas are designated as high risk or moderate risk:

  • High Risk: Classified as Special Flood Hazard Areas (SFHA), these regions face a 1% annual chance of flooding (equivalent to a 26% chance over a 30-year period, or a 100-year flood risk). In these areas, purchasing flood insurance is mandatory.
  • Moderate Risk: These zones have a 0.2% annual chance of flooding (equivalent to a 6% chance within a 30-year timeframe, or a 500-year flood risk). Flood insurance is recommended here. Such areas may transition to high-risk in the future due to factors like urban development or environmental changes.

Has High-Risk Zones Yes (Type: AE)
Closest High-Risk Zone (mi) 0.35
Has Moderate-Risk Zones Yes (Type: X)

Lifestyle

Walkability and Bikeability

The Walk Score, ranging from 0 to 100, gauges an address's accessibility on foot—the higher the score, the easier it is to accomplish daily errands without a car.

Similarly, the Bike Score evaluates an area's suitability for cycling based on infrastructure, topography, proximity to key destinations, road connectivity, and the cycling community's presence.

Walk Score® 79 (Very Walkable)
Bike Score® 51 (Bikeable)

Dating and Marriage Outlook

Gain insights into the area's potential for connections, dating, and finding life partners. This section explores the social landscape, highlighting marital status for residents 15 years and older and detailing the female-to-male ratio for those aged 20 to 44. A ratio above 1 indicates more women than men, suggesting enhanced dating prospects for men, and vice versa.

Marrital Status
Single, Never Married 43.36%
Married 43.26%
Other 13.37%
Female to Male Ratio 1.04

Pet Friendliness

Pets, especially dogs, provide a great way for locals to interact and build connections. If you have pets, you'll likely enjoy living in an area with a high percentage of fellow pet owners.

Has Any Pet 41.68%
Has Dog(s) 32.85%
Has Cat(s) 16.70%

Politics and Social Climate

Voting Patterns

Living in a community that shares your values can be important. Our detailed analysis of Presidential Election results at the precinct level—the most granular unit for voting data—allows you to understand the political tendencies of the area.

On the map, the precicits that intersect with your selected area, along with their vote count in the 2020 election, are presented:

  • Solid Democratic: Precincts where the Democratic margin (percentage voting for the Democratic candidate minus the percentage voting for the Republican candidate) exceeds 15%.
  • Leaning Democratic: Precincts where the Democratic margin is between 5% and 15%.
  • Balanced: Precincts where the democrat margin is between -5% and 5%.
  • Leaning Republican: Precincts where the Republican margin is between 5% and 15%.
  • Solid Republican: Precincts where the Republican margin exceeds 15%.

2020 Presidential Election Results
Joe Biden 67.30%
Donald Trump 31.03%

Ideological Leanings

Gain deeper insights into the social fabric of the neighborhood with data on self-reported ideological leanings, sourced from MRI-Simmons surveys.

Very Liberal 22.33%
Somewhat Liberal 27.73%
Somewhat Conservative 27.69%
Very Conservative 22.24%

Investment Insights

Value Appreciation Forecast

Our forecast uses the latest area-specific trends and market activities to offer a strategic overview of expected growth across the overall area, rather than for individual homes.

Median Home Value 475,779
5-Year Forecast Median Home Value 612,179
5-Year Appreciation Forecast 28.67%

Rental Viability Analysis

Gain insights into median rent and the rent-to-value ratio to identify promising rental investment opportunities. The 1% rule suggests a property is viable if the monthly rent is at least 1% of its value. Note that using area medians may skew this figure, especially if low-end homes dominate the rental market. Despite this, the ratio is a useful initial indicator for further exploration of rental investments.

Median Monthly Rent 2,050
Median Home Value 475,779
Rent to Value Ratio 0.43%
Leave us a review on Google
Did you find this report useful? Please take a moment to rate us on Google. We appreciate your feedback.

Disclaimer: Due to the dynamic nature of the housing market, the information in this report may not always reflect the most current or precise data. Maptimum is not responsible for any discrepancies or inaccuracies.